DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Edwards, 420 So. 2d 663.

222 citing documents.

  • State v. Anderson 784 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Anderson, 29,282 (La.App.2d Cir.06/18/97), ; State v. Branch, 30,733 (La.App.2d Cir.07/06/98), , writ denied, 98-2359 (La.01/08/99), .
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Parker, 96-1852, p. 15 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 747 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Givens 750 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    the Supreme Court held that the recusal or disqualification of an assistant district attorney did not require the recusal of the district attorney or his other assistants.
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    1984); , *798 681 (La.1982)
  • State v. Brooks 734 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    ( ), the Louisiana Supreme Court held: Evidence of the victim's dangerous character or threats against the accused supports a plea of self-defense because it is relevant to show that the victim was the aggre
  • Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Tamporello v. State Farm Mut.
  • State v. Jackson 734 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Bannister 726 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Washington 716 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Montz, 92-2073 (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 716 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Montz, 92-2073 (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 714 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Washington 706 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
    and penalty phase closing argument concerning an unconstitutional presumption on intent struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court were not prejudicial, given that jurors were correctly charged and that it was possible to conclude that the error "was not so dominant that the jurors could not adhere to their charged duty to accept and to apply the law as given by the court.") (prosecutor's erroneous statement of law on intent at closing argument cured by requested admonition); -725 (La.1982) (prosecut
  • State v. Kendrick 699 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    State v. Boudreaux, 95-153 (La.App.
  • State v. Anderson 697 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Parker 696 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Williams 693 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    State v. Montz, 92-2073 (La.App.
  • State v. Small 693 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Stacy 686 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Carter 684 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Roy 681 So. 2d 1230 La. 1996
    (district attorney's erroneous statement of the law on intent at closing argument cured by requested admonition); (district attorney's erroneous statement of the law on intent at voir dire cured by requested admonition and correct instruction); State v. Gut
  • State v. Harris 679 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Demery 679 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. James 675 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    State v. Montz, 92-2073 (La.App.
  • State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Boudreaux 662 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Van Winkle 658 So. 2d 198 La. 1995
  • State v. Terry 654 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Manuel 646 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Gardner 649 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Montz 632 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
  • State v. Gantt 616 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • Segura v. Andries 610 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Watson 609 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    His contention attacking the absence of a unanimous jury verdict as being unconstitution *1205
  • State v. Carouthers 607 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Crandell 604 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Smith 600 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Bender 598 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Battieste 597 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Ducre 596 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Torres 580 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Flowers 574 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Kidd 568 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Dietrich 567 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Daughtery 563 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990