Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Raymo, 419 So. 2d 858.

203 citing documents.

State v. Harrison 505 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Kitchen 504 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Kitchen, argues that the evidence was lacking.
State v. Laino 499 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Lennon 496 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Bradley 490 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the defendant maintains that since the Supreme Court has held that under R.S.
State v. Nicholas 491 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Medford 489 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Appellant counsel urges the court to review the evidence presented at trial to determine whether, as a matter of law, the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, as authority for such a review.
State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
State v. Joseph 483 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
we have reviewed the record for sufficiency of the evidence.
State v. Doolittle 482 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Harper 480 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Jackson 480 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Mitchell 480 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Harris 480 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Carney 476 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
we will review the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, even though it was not specifically alleged as error.
State v. Simpson 475 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Ford 473 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Davis 474 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Sufficiency of Evidence: Although not specifically assigned as error, the sufficiency of evidence to support Davis’
State v. Price 475 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction must be reviewed even if not specifically alleged as error.
State v. Bruce 472 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Square 468 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
we will review the evidence to determine if it is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction.
State v. Wallace 466 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Fairbanks 467 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 466 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
the record has also been reviewed for sufficiency regarding the conviction on the armed robbery charge.
State v. Brown 466 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hall 464 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Although not alleged as an assignment of error, the sufficiency of evidence to support appellant’s
State v. Poche 464 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Although not alleged as an assignment of error
State v. Imbornone 462 So. 2d 1236 La. 1985
this court discussed the concept of intent to defraud in the context of the forgery article, La.R.S.
State v. Robinson 463 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Although not assigned as error
State v. Picchini 463 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Gordon 463 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Liddell 463 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Allen 463 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. James 463 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Browder 471 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Although not specifically assigned as error, the sufficiency of evidence to support the appellant’s
State v. Davis 463 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Wilson 463 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, and Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
Criticized State ex rel. Sprinkle v. Cain 463 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
While the opinion of this Court does not reflect that the sufficiency of the evidence was a question presented for appellate review, each record is examined for evidentiary sufficiency and we are not persuaded by the relator’s argument that the evidence in this case was insufficient to support his conviction for simple burglary.
State v. Dauzart 461 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Robinson 461 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
We find that viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution any reasonable trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of armed robbery.
State v. Collins 461 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we conclude there was sufficient evidence upon which a rational trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Chestnut 462 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Relator also complains that the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
State v. Williams 460 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Tomlinson 457 So. 2d 651 La. 1984
State v. Lee 458 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
also requires review of a record for "sufficiency of evidence" under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Bailey 457 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Art. 920(2); Jackson v. Virginia; 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. McKinney 455 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Before considering defendant’s assignments of error, we have reviewed the record, including the seventeen page transcript of the motion to suppress the identification and the eighty-nine page transcript of the trial
State v. Credit 455 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Simmons 455 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
also requires review of a record for “sufficiency of evidence” under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 309 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Arrington 455 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984