Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Raymo, 419 So. 2d 858.

203 citing documents.

State v. Calzadilla 455 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Although not alleged as an assignment of error
State v. Hawthorne 454 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Although defendant has not raised an assignment of error concerning the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, we have reviewed the documents in the record and the 52
State v. Fluker 454 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Whitlock 454 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Singleton 454 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
*355 Although not alleged as an assignment of error, the sufficiency of evidence to support appellants’
State v. Crawford 454 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Before turning to defendant’s assignments of error, we have reviewed the documents in the record and the 78 (La.
State v. Savage 454 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Although not alleged as an assignment of error
State v. Slaughter 451 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Sufficiency of Evidence Although not alleged as an assignment of error
State v. Green 450 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Sufficiency of Evidence Although not specifically assigned as error, the sufficiency of evidence to support the appellant’s
State v. Silbey 450 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Nelson 449 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE Although appellant does not allege as an assignment of error the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction
State v. Mathieu 449 So. 2d 1087 La. 1984
Art. 920(2) this case has been reviewed for errors patent and for sufficiency of evidence.
State v. Jasmin 449 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Upon review of the 62 page transcript of the judge trial, we conclude there was sufficient evidence upon which a rational trier of fact could find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Sigur 449 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Upon review of the 148 page transcript of the judge trial, we conclude there was sufficient evidence upon which a rational trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Taylor 449 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Blunt 449 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Although not alleged as an assignment of error, the sufficiency of evidence to support *130
State v. Swift 449 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Vaughn 448 So. 2d 1260 La. 1984
State v. Russell 448 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
However, our Supreme Court stated: *800 “Because the state’s case was devoid of evidence of an essential element of the charged offense, i.e., an intent to defraud, defendant’s conviction and sentence must be set aside ...
State v. Simpson 447 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Pipkins 447 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Lamothe 447 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Franklin 449 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Guillory 447 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Rivers 446 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Lawson 446 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
also requires review of a record for “sufficiency of evidence” under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Harrison 446 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Although not alleged as an assignment of error
State v. Ogletree 446 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Upon review of the 141 we conclude there was sufficient evidence upon which a rational trier *417 of fact could find the defendants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Brown 446 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Day 444 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
also requires review of a record for “sufficiency of evidence” under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Jones 445 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Upon review of the 35 page transcript of the jury trial, we conclude there was sufficient evidence upon which a rational trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Kent 444 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1st Cir.1983), the Louisiana Supreme Court, indicated that although the assignments of error do not so dictate, all transcripts of evidence in criminal proceedings must be reviewed on the appellate level to determine whether or not there exists sufficient evidence to support a conviction.
State v. Francis 444 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1st Cir.1983), the Louisiana Supreme Court, indicated that although the assignments of error do not so dictate, all transcripts of evidence in criminal proceedings must be reviewed on the appellate level to determine whether or not there exists sufficient evidence to support a conviction.
State v. Lofton 442 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Upon review of the 185 page transcript of the jury trial, we conclude there was sufficient evidence upon which a rational trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Dixon 442 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Boyd 442 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Crain 442 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
at p. 861, the Supreme Court stated "regardless of how the error is brought to the attention of the reviewing court”, the question of sufficiency of evidence, or the lack of, to convict a defendant can be reviewed on appeal ex proprio motu, "without considering the defendant’s assignments of error".
State v. Griffin 442 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the Louisiana Supreme Court seemed to indicate that although the assignments of error do not so dictate, all transcripts of evidence in criminal proceedings must be reviewed on the appellate level to determine whether or not there exists sufficient evidence to support a con *699 viction.
State v. Allen 440 So. 2d 1330 La. 1983
Later, we recognized our authority to review sufficiency, even though defendant did not raise this issue in this court by assignment of error.
State v. Williams 438 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Buggage 439 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
at p. 861, the Supreme Court stated “regardless of how the error is brought to the attention of the reviewing court”, the question of sufficiency of evidence, or the lack of, to convict a defendant can be reviewed on appeal ex proprio motu, “without considering the defendant’s assignments of error”.
State v. Moore 439 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Finally, although not assigned as error, (La.
State v. Donaldson 439 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Before passing to the final assignment of error which has to do with the sentence, and measures up to the standards required for a proper conviction under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Acevedo 439 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Upon review of the 92 page transcript of the jury trial, we conclude there was sufficient evidence upon which a rational trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Hodges 438 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
however, suggests that a record should also be reviewed for sufficiency of evidence under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Hodges 438 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Lee 436 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
[2] Additionally, although the conviction itself was not assigned as error
State v. Rhome 436 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Paul 433 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
However, requires review of a record for sufficiency of evidence under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Loving 432 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
also requires review of a record for “sufficiency of evidence” under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.