Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Graham, 422 So. 2d 123.

184 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jkari Campbell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Steven Dwayne Rigmaiden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
As we have recognized in such cases 13 the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
State of Louisiana v. Marvin Santiago La. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jordan D. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
some jurors conducted their own blood-coagulation experiment.
State of Louisiana Versus Terrell Nix La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Michael Edwin Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Lisa W. Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
2d 965, 968 (La.1986); -475 (La.1983); (citing cases); - 1231 (La.1983); appeal dismissed, Graham v. Louisiana, 461 U.S. 950, 103 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Leo Dorsey La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
15:438 in tandem, at 129 (La.1982), as follows: [A] merger does not appear to promote clarity but could lead to a distortion of the standards.
State of Louisiana v. Frin Wayne Coward La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Corday Treveil Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
1487, 67 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); appeal dismissed, 461 U.S. 950, 103 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Roman Joseph Lastrapes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
State v. Thompson 259 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
State v. Dressner 255 So. 3d 537 La. 2018
1988) (citing State v. Graham , , 137 (La.
State v. Reeves 254 So. 3d 665 La. 2018
1988) (citing State v. Graham , , 137 (La.
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Graham , , 129-30 (La.
State v. Francois 242 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Chester 208 So. 3d 338 La. 2016
State v. Blank 192 So. 3d 93 La. 2016
See, e.g., State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201, (La.2/28/96), (unpub’d appx.); State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), ; *103 544-45 (La.1988) ().
State v. Tucker 170 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
see also State v. Johnson, 2000-0680 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel Joseph Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Harmon 139 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State in the Interest of C.D. 93 So. 3d 1272 La. 2012
(“In comparison with the prosecution’s hypothesis of defendant’s guilt, which is consistent overall with the evidence, the defendant’s circumstantial theory of innocence is remote.”).
State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Louisiana courts are “required to take evidence upon well-pleaded allegations of prejudicial juror misconduct....” -132 (La.1982); (La.App.
State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Louisiana courts are “required to take evidence upon well-pleaded allegations of prejudicial juror misconduct....” -132 (La.1982); (La.App.
State ex rel. D.R. 51 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
However, he should not consider facts relating to the case unless introduced at trial under constitutional and legal standards.” (citing to Sinegal, supra).
State v. Ingram 47 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
art. 606(B), and concluded as follows: Louisiana courts are “required to take evidence upon well-pleaded allegations of prejudicial juror misconduct....” -132 (La.1982); writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
and [could] employ this type of practical knowledge in his deliberations....”
State v. Johnson 33 So. 3d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In support of his juror misconduct argument
State of Louisiana v. Rodney Messick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. McKemie 17 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Steven Mark Marc" Anderson " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
.” -132 (La.1982); (La.App.
State v. Anderson 2 So. 3d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Louisiana courts are “required to take evidence upon well-pleaded allegations of prejudicial juror mis-conduct_” -132 (La.1982); (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Thomas Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
appeal dismissed, Graham v. Louisiana, 461 U.S. 950, 103 S.Ct.
State v. Smith 969 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
appeal dismissed, Graham v. Louisiana, 461 U.S. 950 , 103 S.Ct.
State v. Hailey 953 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
1558 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989), appeal dismissed, 461 U.S. 950 , 103 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Donald Cogswell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Cogswell 918 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
1558 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989) (); ); see also, State v. Smith, 95-1826 (La.App.
Distinguished State of Louisiana v. Elbertine Demery Sykes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
appeal dismissed, 461 U.S. 950, 103 S.Ct.
Distinguished State v. Sykes 857 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
appeal dismissed, 461 U.S. 950 , 103 S.Ct.
State v. Rodriguez 839 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
State v. Currie 812 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Johnson 796 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by