Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bagents v. Bagents, 419 So. 2d 460.

85 citing documents.

Kimberly Jeanne Champagne Menard v. Tony James Menard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Amber Lynn Lange Frazier v. Shelton Lundra Frazier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
In re State 257 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
Bagents v. Bagents , , 462 (La.
Evans v. Evans 247 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Ronda Maxwell Hudson v. Clint Tucker Strother La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Hudson v. Strother 246 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 1988) (citing Bagents v. Bagents , ) ).
State in the Interest of P. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State ex rel. of P.T. 159 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Edward Gary Mitchell v. Sandra Marie Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Ramsey v. Morales 131 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(upholding change of custody from mother who had lived in open concubinage in the custodial home).
Jeremy A. Varney v. Shannon M. Varney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Gregory Kevin Poole, III v. Kristie McMillin Poole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Stephens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
Poole v. Poole 100 So. 3d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Stephens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
Melissa A. Porter v. Jeff D. Porter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Stevens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
Porter v. Porter 74 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Stevens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
McFall v. Armstrong 75 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
Nicole Lormand v. David A. Lormand La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Stephens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
Bradley Griffith v. Resa Latiolais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Stephens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
Griffith v. Latiolais 70 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Stephens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
David Eugene Garcia v. Michelle Rushing Garcia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Garcia v. Garcia 49 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Bradley Griffith v. Resa Latiolais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Stephens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
McCormic v. Rider 27 So. 3d 277 La. 2010
Thomas Neil Guidry, Jr. v. Theresa Kaiser Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Guidry v. Guidry 979 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Smith v. Smith 977 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Richardson v. Richardson 974 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Christian D. Chesson v. Sarah Rebecca Duhon Chesson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Stephens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
Chesson v. Chesson 966 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Stephens v. Stephens, 02-402 (La.App.
Laura Leonard Leblanc v. Mitchel Brett Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 953 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana in the Interest of T.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State ex rel. T.M. 869 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Francois v. Leon 834 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Bergeron v. Clark 832 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Greene v. Taylor 809 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Miller v. Miller 799 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Kuhl v. Kuhl, 97-1725 (La.App.
State ex rel. K.A.M. 809 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Deason v. Deason 759 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State ex rel. AR 754 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Bagents v. Ba- *1078 gents
State Ex Rel. Ar 754 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Bagents v. Bagents, *1078
Hebert v. Blanchard 702 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Rupert v. Swinford 671 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Rush v. Rush 640 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Melancon v. Bergeron 598 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Messina v. Messina 592 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Simmons v. Simmons 554 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Finally, although we are cognizant of the vast amount of discretion vested in the trial court in its function of deciding custody cases, we nevertheless find that the trial court in the present case abused its discretion in terminating joint custody.
Bauchmoyer v. Spelta 548 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lozes v. Lozes 542 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Looney v. Looney 536 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
our Supreme Court explained: “In performing its function of deciding custody cases, the trial court is vested with a vast amount of discretion.