Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Morton v. Jefferson Parish Council, 419 So. 2d 431.

31 citing documents.

James Deslonde, Britany Deslonde, and Evan Plauche v. St. Tammany Parish La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
3000-3032 St. Claude Avenue, LLC v. the City of New Orleans and the New Orleans City Council La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
St. Martin Parish Government v. Bryan Champagne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Myers 145 So. 3d 320 La. 2014
Folsom Road Civic Association v. Parish of St.
Moretco, Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish Council 112 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
titutional and invalid because it “fail[ed] to prescribe uniform rules or standards to guide the City Council”); (zoning ordinance requiring adoption of an ordinance to create a special zone for a mobile home or trailer park but which provides no objective standards to City-Parish Council is unconstitutional); (ordinance respecting issuance of a special use permit is unconstitutional notwithstanding “inclusion of general criteria on which approval is contingent”).
Berry v. Volunteers of America, Inc. 64 So. 3d 347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
citing Folsom Road Civic Ass’n v. Parish of St.
Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. v. City of Shreveport 44 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Toups v. City of Shreveport 37 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that special uses had been defined as a: group of uses neither absolutely permitted as of right nor prohibited by law.
Daigle v. Jefferson Parish Council 40 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Urban Housing of America, Inc. v. City of Shreveport 26 So. 3d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Poole v. Louisiana Board of Electrolysis Examiners 964 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See also Morton v. Jefferson Parish *964 Council (holding that mandamus is the appropriate procedural device to compel approval by a governing authority (in that case, the zoning board) of a permit application that was wrongfully denied); Clark v. City of Shreveport, 26,638, pp. 9-11 (La.App.
Roudakis v. City of Ruston 927 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Plaintiffs cited a number of cases to support their contention that the variances were granted in error: Tiber Petroleum, McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, 231 La.
Guarisco v. Jefferson Parish Zoning Appeals Board 877 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Appellants argue that the Jefferson Parish Zoning Appeals Board is not empowered to find that an ordinance is too vague to enforce, and that their refusal to enforce this particular ordinance in this case is an unconstitutional action
King v. Caddo Parish Com'n 719 So. 2d 410 La. 1998
Bailey v. Parish of Caddo 716 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Const. Art. 6 § 17; and citations therein.
Jenkins v. St. Tammany Parish Police Jury 716 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
STATE, DEPT. OF SOC. SERV. v. New Orleans 676 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Clark v. City of Shreveport 655 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Mellion v. City of Plaquemine 654 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
INTER URBAN BAR ASS'N, INC. v. City of New Orleans 652 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
St. Charles Gaming v. Riverboat Gaming 648 So. 2d 1310 La. 1995
1990); Folsom Road Civic Association v. Parish of St.
Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com'n of Calcasieu Parish 561 So. 2d 482 La. 1990
Four States Realty, supra ; Folsom Road Civic Association v. Parish of St.
City of New Orleans v. Rasmussen 542 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
As previously discussed an ordinance which creates zones for exclusive uses is constitutional.
Haynesville Merchantile Co. v. City of Bossier 522 So. 2d 1085 La. 1988
2 *1086 The trial court ruled that Section 31-97 is unconstitutional under this court’s
Zoning Bd. of City of Hammond v. Tangipahoa Ass'n for Retarded Citizens 510 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Gardner v. City of Harahan 504 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Kiser v. Parish of Jefferson 498 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
In support of their argument of unconstitutionality, (La.
Estate of Littleton v. Dean 471 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Castle Investors, Inc. v. Jefferson Parish Council 472 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
4th Cir.1982); modified, by the Supreme Court, at
Barney's Family Market, Inc. v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 452 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
DeCuir v. Town of Marksville 426 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by