Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harlaux v. Harlaux, 426 So. 2d 602.

18 citing documents.

  • Succession of Byrd 142 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • Succession of Matthews 145 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In the Louisiana Supreme Court declared that Article 919 was unconstitutional “in that it unreasonably discriminated against illegitimate children by denying them the same inheritance rights in the successions of their fathers, under any circumstances, as [were] enjoyed by their legitimate counterparts.” 3
  • Richard v. BD. OF SUPER. OF LA. STATE UNIV. 960 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • McConnell v. Dorsey 931 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • Sherman v. Touro Infirmary Hospital 832 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    594 (La.1983) (on original hearing and rehearing); cert.
  • Marmer v. Queen of New Orleans 787 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Hulin v. Fibreboard, 178 F.3d 316 , 327 (5th Cir.1999); cert.
  • Matter of Succession of Williams 608 So. 2d 973 La. 1992
  • Savoy v. Savoy 532 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Lee v. Succession of Chapman 463 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Succession of Landry 460 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • In the Matter of Thomas 450 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Keating v. Cambre 446 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Jackson v. D’Aubin, -82 (La.1976); -81 (La.App.
  • Smith v. Stephens 443 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    All of the defendants filed exceptions of no cause of action premised on the holdings of
  • Bedford v. Sanders 437 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    See 41 LLR 372 (1981); 42 LLR 401 (1982); Theriot, supra.
  • In re Successions of Watkins 431 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    indicates that it is the date of the death of the decedent which controls retroactive application of Brown.
  • In re Succession of Layssard 430 So. 2d 657 La. 1983
  • In the Matter of Succession of Theriot 428 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    The Louisiana Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in on rehearing
  • Succession of Payne v. Payne 426 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Although in Brown and Clivens the court was concerned with the inheritance rights of acknowledged illegitimate children, Louisiana Supreme Court docket number 82-C-0760, handed down the same day as the decision in Clivens, that the legal principles espoused in Brown and Clivens were equally applicable to unacknowledged illegitimates.