Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers, 421 So. 2d 216.

179 citing documents.

James K Fawvor v. Edmund E. Caswell, III. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Edna Breaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
White v. Cox Operating, LLC 267 So. 3d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
6/27/18), , 878-79 (citing Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers , (La.
In re Coop. Endeavor Agreement Between 42nd Dist. Indigent Defender Office & 42nd Judicial District Office of Dist. … 255 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Quoting the landmark case of Leenerts Farms v. Rogers , (La.
Kerry Maggio v. James Parker The Sandwich Kings, LLC (d/B/A Jimmy John's) Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company And Metropolitan Property … 250 So. 3d 874 La. 2018
Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers , (La.
Tubbs v. Daryl Flood Relocation, Inc. 210 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
1987); Leenerts Farms, (La.
Harlton K. Stanley v. Crowell & Owens, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Stanley v. Crowell & Owens, LLC 141 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Skannal v. Jones Odom Davis & Politz, L.L.P. 124 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Leenerts Farm [Farms], Singer, Hunter [Hutner], Levine, Seeman & Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., *509 supra; LSBA v. Connolly, supra; Ex Parte Steckler, supra.
Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Danielle Bodin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Dixie Campers, see also Leenerts Farms
Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Bodin 107 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dixie Campers, see also Leenerts Farms
Comella v. Bsm Financial, Lp 32 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Nungesser, supra, citing Leenerts Farms
Cunard Line Limited Co. v. Datrex Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
See RPC 1.5; Leenerts Farms, Inc., and Chittenden
Cunard Line Ltd. v. Datrex, Inc. 26 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See RPC 1.5; Leenerts Farms, Inc.,[ v. Rogers, 82-0070 (La.10/18/82)] , and Chittenden[ v. State Farm Mut.
Brookewood v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four 958 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
[3] As to the second issue, Sixty-Three cites Leenerts Farms, for the proposition that the court has authority to review the reasonableness of attorney's fees.
Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANA, INC. 952 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See generally Leenerts Farms, (La.
Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell v. Tommie Mack Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Gold v. Granger 947 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Industrial Screw & Supply Co. v. WPS, Inc. 926 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
9:2781 in determining that the Plaintiff was entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and/or attorney fees fixed at 25% of the amount awarded based solely on an agreement between the Plaintiff and its attorney instead of using the analysis provided for by the Rules of | ^Professional Conduct as set forth in Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers[, ].
In Re Succession of Sporl 900 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Walker v. STATE, DOTD 817 So. 2d 57 La. 2002
See Leenerts Farms, Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., Husk v. Blancand, 155 La.
Rivet v. STATE, DOTD 800 So. 2d 777 La. 2001
Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 788 So. 2d 1140 La. 2001
Leenerts Farm[s], Singer, Hunter, Levine, Seeman & Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., supra ; LSBA v. Connolly, supra ; Ex Parte Steckler, supra .
Poullard v. Poullard 780 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Short v. Plantation Management Corp. 781 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-401 (La.1987); Leenerts Farms
Crawford v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF LA. 770 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
For a listing of the non-exclusive criteria for determining the reasonableness of a fee, see Leenerts Farms
Harvey v. BE & K CONST. 770 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Succession of Abdalla 764 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
attorney fees are subject to review and control by the courts.” Leenerts Farms
National Information Services v. Gottsegen 737 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Edmundson Bros. v. Montex Drilling Co. 731 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
McDonald v. City of Bastrop 720 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Leenerts Farms, (La.App.
Wilson v. Head 707 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
arts.1983, 2045 and 2046; Leenerts Farms, (La.App.
Keene v. Reggie 701 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Ortego v. STATE, DOTD 689 So. 2d 1358 La. 1997
Dixie Campers, see also Leenerts Farms
Alco Collections, Inc. v. Poirier 680 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Succession of Wallace, 574 So.2d at 350 ; Leenerts Farms, Singer, Hutner, Levine, Seeman & Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., 373 So.2d at 110, 115 .
Nungesser v. Nungesser 694 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Barreca v. Cobb 668 So. 2d 1129 La. 1996
Peyton Place, Condominium Ass'n v. Guastella 668 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
icable to contracts is that extrinsic evidence is admissible only “when the terms of a written contract are susceptible to more than one interpretation, or there is uncertainty or ambiguity as to its provisions, or the intent of the parties cannot be ascertained from the language employed.” Dixie Campers, see also Leenerts Farms
PEYTON PLACE, CONDO. ASS'N, INC. v. Guastella 668 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Dixie Campers, see also Leenerts Farms
In Re Tutor. of Property of Huddleston 655 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Leenert's Farms, abrogated on other grounds by Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.
Succession of McLean 651 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Midboe v. Com'n on Ethics for Pub. Empl. 646 So. 2d 351 La. 1994
Saucier; Singer Hutner Levine, etc.; Leenerts Farms, Succession of Wallace .
Crochet v. Pierre 646 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
La.Civ.Code art. 2046; Leenerts Farms, (La.App.
Davidson v. Broadhead 649 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Leenerts Farms, ” Ruston State Bank & (La.App.
Fawer, Brian, Hardy & Zatzkis v. Howes 639 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
The term "clearly excessive" used by the Court in Leenerts Farms [ Inc. v. Rogers ], [ ] supra, was taken from the provisions of DR 2-106 of the Code of Professional Responsibility as they existed at that time.
Woodrow Wilson Const. v. Mmr-Radon Constr. 635 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
2045, 2046; Leenerts Farms
Poche v. Bayliner Marine Corp. 632 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
We have considered the particular facts of this matter and the reasonableness of the fee in terms of the factors set forth in Leenerts Farms, now codified in Rule 1.5(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Louisiana State Bar Association.
Teche Bank and Trust Co. v. Willis 631 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Brown v. Drillers, Inc. 630 So. 2d 741 La. 1994
Dixie Campers, see also Leenerts Farms
Blanton v. Malkem International Corp. 628 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by