Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers, 421 So. 2d 216.

179 citing documents.

Durham Life Ins. Co. v. Lee 625 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
This "reasonableness inquiry" applies where attorney fees are set by statute, -401 (La.1987); where attorney fees are set by contractual agreement, Leenerts Farms, as well as where attorney fees are set on a contingency fee basis, Moody v. Arabie, 498 So.2d at 1086 (La.1986) and Pharis &amp
Miller & Miller v. Home Insurance Co. 625 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Thanh Mai v. Blair 634 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Leenarts Farms, whether the fee is contingent upon recovery.
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. 616 So. 2d 1234 La. 1993
641 , Matte v. Continental Trailways, Inc., Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Leenerts Farms
Bespress, Inc. v. Capital Bank of Delhi 616 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Art. 931; Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Leenerts Farms
Ouachita Parish Police Jury v. AM. WASTE AND POLLUTION CONTROL CO. 606 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
STATE, DOTD v. Williamson 597 So. 2d 439 La. 1992
Prestenbach v. Louisiana Power & Light 592 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Blanchard 620 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Malbrough v. Wallace 594 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Aldredge v. Whitney 591 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
2045, 2046; Smith, supra ; Leenerts Farms
Drury v. Fawer 590 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Cortina v. Gulf States Utilities 594 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Milstead v. Louisiana Power and Light Co. 581 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Milstead contends the exception to the jurisdiction should not have been sustained and the exception of no cause of action should not have been sustained in part to dismiss part of his demands, citing the general rule recognized in Leenerts Farms
O & M CONST. v. State, Div. of Admin. 576 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1983, 2045 and 2046) [4] ; Leenerts Farms, (La.
O & M Construction, Inc. v. State, Division of Administration 576 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1983, 2045 and 2046) 4 ; Leenerts Farms, (La.App.
Succession of Wallace 574 So. 2d 348 La. 1991
1983); Leenerts Farm, (La.
THIBAUT v. Smith and Loveless 576 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
NOTES [*] Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon is serving as judge pro tempore by special appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court to fill the vacancy created by the death of Judge Steve A. Alford, Jr. [1] Leenerts Farms, set out criteria to be used in evaluating reasonableness of a fee.
First National Bank of West Monroe v. Inabnet 571 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
See: Leenerts Farms, and Ruston State Bank & (La.App.
Karageorge v. Cole 565 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Leenerts Farms, (La.App.
Commercial Nat. Bank v. Keene 561 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Leenerts Farms, Tahoe Corp. v. P & G Gathering Systems, (La.
Blue v. Schoen 556 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Factors which are pertinent to the determination of attorney fees, or their reasonableness where the amount is disputed, were set forth in Leenerts Farms, now codified in Rule 1.5(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Louisiana State Bar Association, which replaced the Code of Professional Responsibility effective January 1, 1987.
Fritz v. First Federal Savings Bank of New Orleans 559 So. 2d 489 La. 1990
John Deere Co. v. Eames 556 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
We held in Leenerts Farms, that the prohibition against a lawyer accepting a "clearly excessive fee" found in Disciplinary Rule 2-106 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, cannot be abrogated by a provision in a note fixing the amount of attorney fees as a percentage of the amount to be collected.
First Nat. Bank v. City of New Orleans 555 So. 2d 1345 La. 1990
La.Civ.Code art. 2046; Leenerts Farms
Pham v. Anderson 556 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
We held in Leenerts Farms, that the prohibition against a lawyer accepting a “clearly excessive fee” found in Disciplinary Rule 2-106 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, cannot be abrogated by a provision in a note fixing the amount of attorney fees as a percentage of the amount to be collected.
Oak Tree Savings Bank v. Creighton Construction Co. 556 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Gulf Wide Towing, Inc. v. FE WRIGHT (UK) LTD. 554 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Desselle v. Moreauville State Bank 553 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Gibson v. Burns, supra, at page 69, citing Leenerts Farms
STATE, DEPT OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Clark 548 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Colonial Bank v. Takee Outee Management Corp. 547 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
The appellants cite no authority for their proposition, for the proposition that attorney fees must be reasonable and cannot be set by contractual provisions which may provide unreasonable fees.
Esteve v. Huntsinger 549 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In Leenerts Farms, the court overruled a 1934 case that had held promissory note provisions for attorney’s fees valid as stipulations for liquidated damages.
Ruston State Bank & Trust Co. v. Streeter 545 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
CAJUN ELEC. POWER CO-OP., INC. v. Public Serv. Com'n 544 So. 2d 362 La. 1989
Concordia Bank & Trust Co. v. Lowry 539 So. 2d 46 La. 1989
We also reverse the court of appeal's judgment insofar as it affirmed the award for attorney fees of 25% of the amount due, and Leenerts Farms
State v. Chavez 540 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Hebert v. Hebert 535 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
John Deere Co. v. Crowe 535 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Thomas v. Evergreen Presbyterian Ministries, Inc. 535 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Anderson 533 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Bordelon v. Cochrane 533 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Keever v. Knighten 532 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Leenerts Farms, Spencer v. Carroll, 506 So.
Succession of Cloud 530 So. 2d 1146 La. 1988
342 , (1942); Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., Leenerts Farms
Allen v. Burnett 530 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank 528 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Cambridge Corner Corp. v. Menard 525 So. 2d 527 La. 1988
Gorman v. Swaggart 524 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Patel v. Bank of the Mid South 522 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Rollo v. Lousteau 522 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Leenerts Farms, Oubre v. Bank of St.
Sims v. Hays 521 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Central Progressive Bank v. Bradley, supra; LSA-Const.