Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers, 421 So. 2d 216.

179 citing documents.

Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Little Ford, Inc. 522 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
3) The court should fix attorney's fees pursuant to Leenerts Farms
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 516 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Leenerts Farms, Gulf Oil Corp. v. Marine Concrete Structures, Inc., (La.App.
First National Bank of Commerce v. Pontchartrain Leasing Co. 519 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
We held in Leenerts Farms, that the prohibition against a lawyer accepting a “clearly excessive fee” found in Disciplinary Rule 2-106 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, cannot be abrogated by a provision in a note fixing the amount of attorney fees as a percentage of the amount to be collected.
Ciaccio v. Cazayoux 519 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
2045, 2046; Leenerts Farms
Succession of Herrle 517 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Sunbelt Federal Bank, F.S.B v. Catha 517 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
5th Cir.1984) and Leenerts Farms
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Krasnoff 515 So. 2d 780 La. 1987
Const. 1974, art. II §§ 1, 2; art. V § 5(B); See, Leenerts Farms, (La.
Lester v. Lester 516 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Leenerts Farms, Inc., v. Rogers
THIBAUT v. Smith & Loveless, Inc. 517 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., Leenerts Farms
Oberfell v. Oberfell 516 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
art. 2045, 2046; Leenerts Farms, Bonfanti Marine, (La.App.
Wuertz v. Tobias 512 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Martin v. Champagne 507 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Art. 2000, amended in 1985, legislatively overruled Leenerts Farms, which held to the contrary.
Scott v. Noel 506 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
In Leenerts Farms, our Supreme Court held that, despite a provision in a promissory note stipulating attorney fees, courts could inquire into the reasonableness of the fee.
Central Progressive Bank v. Bradley 506 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Pursuant to Leenerts Farms, factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of an attorney fee include the following in Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 2-106(B): (1) The time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly.
Spencer v. Carroll 506 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Leenerts Farms, (La.App.
Gibson v. Burns 505 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
The amendment to Civil Code Article 1935 (now Article 2000) was an attempt to legislatively overrule the Louisiana Supreme Court decision of Leenerts Farms, (La.
Adams v. Adams 503 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Leenerts Farms, (La.App.
Central Progressive Bank v. Bradley 502 So. 2d 1017 La. 1987
We held in Leenerts Farms, that the prohibition against a lawyer accepting a "clearly excessive fee" found in Disciplinary Rule 2-106 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, cannot be abrogated by a provision in a note fixing the amount of attorney fees as a percentage of the amount to be collected.
City of Baton Rouge v. Stauffer Chemical Co. 500 So. 2d 397 La. 1987
The judge, citing Leenerts Farms, (La.
ST. JOHN BAPTIST PARISH ASS'N OF EDUCATORS v. St. John Baptist Parish School Bd. 494 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
art. 2045-2046) Leenerts Farms
Butler v. Crescent Land & Development Co. 499 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Leenerts Farms, (La.App.
Moody v. Arabie 498 So. 2d 1081 La. 1986
Leenerts Farms, and Calk v. Highland Construction & Manufacturing, Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., (on rehearing).
Central Progressive Bank v. Bradley 496 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In Leenerts Farms, a debtor attacked the reasonableness of an attorney fee in a promissory note held by a mortgage creditor.
Amoco Production Co. v. Slaughter 491 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1983, 2045 and 2046; Leenerts Farms, (La.
Sara, Inc. v. Southeastern Aviation (Texas) Inc. 490 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Krasnoff 488 So. 2d 1002 La. 1986
Leenerts Farms, Singer Hutner Levine Seeman &amp
Barnhill v. Barnhill 488 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
5th Cir.1984); Leenerts Farms, (La.
Clement v. Clement 487 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
*761 1945 and 1946 Louisiana National Leasing Corporation v. ADF Service, Inc. Leenerts Farms
Bonfanti v. Davis 487 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
In Leenerts Farms, our Supreme Court held that, despite a provision in a promissory note stipulating attorney's fees, courts could inquire into the reasonableness of the fee.
Gavin v. Superior Applicators, Inc. 484 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
[4] The trial court specifically enunciated and applied the required standards as set out in Leenerts Farms
Perrin, Landry, deLaunay & Durand v. Davis 482 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Richard v. Broussard 482 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Gibsland Bank & Trust Co. v. Boddie 480 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
and the amendments to LSA-C.C.
Graham v. Sequoya Corp. 478 So. 2d 1223 La. 1985
Ross v. Sheriff of Lafourche Parish 479 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Matherne v. Rise 479 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
art. 1945; Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers, supra, [ ] at 218; (La.App.
Verbick v. RGC Investments, Inc. 477 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
With regard to attorneys' fees, the Supreme Court, in Leenert's Farms, held that while parties are permitted to contract with respect to attorney fees, such fees are subject to review and control by the courts.
Rhodes v. Congregation of St. Francis 476 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Graham v. Sequoya Corp. 468 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hardware Wholesalers, Inc. v. Guilbeau 473 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
art. 1945; Leenerts Farms, (La.App.
Fielding v. Geffen 473 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
art. 1945; Leenerts Farms, Bonfanti Marine, (La.App.
Beninate v. Licata 473 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
In Leenerts Farms, the Supreme Court ruled that courts may inquire into the reasonableness of attorney fees fixed in a note by the parties as a percentage of the amount due upon default of the debtor.
Magri v. Lee 470 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
art. 2045-2046) Leenerts Farms
Easterling v. Halter Marine, Inc. 470 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-106
Brass v. Minnieweather 468 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
In Leenerts Farms, the Supreme Court held that a court may inquire into the reasonableness of attorney's fees which have been fixed in a note by the parties as a percentage of the amount due upon default of the debtor.
State v. Perez 464 So. 2d 737 La. 1985
Const. art. 5, § 5(B); Leenerts Farms, Singer, Hunter, Levine, Seeman & Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., (on rehearing).
National Bank of Bossier City v. Nations 465 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Cognizant of the principles of Leenerts Farms, under which a fee of twenty-five percent of a $300,000 award would be clearly excessive, NBBC suggests a fee of $10,000 for its collection services.
W & W Clarklift, Inc. v. Dixie Motor Freight, Inc. 464 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Marine Concrete Structures, Inc. 464 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Caplan v. Latter & Blum, Inc. 462 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Appellant cites Leenerts Farms, (La.