Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Entrevia v. Hood, 427 So. 2d 1146.

299 citing documents.

Williams v. Exxon Corp. 541 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Deblois v. Republic Vanguard Ins. Co. 537 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Levie v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 537 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Fruge v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 536 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Davidson v. Shreveport Yacht Club, Inc. 535 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Rasmussen v. State Farm Fire & Casualty, (La.App.
Foster v. Richland Parish General Hospital 535 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Boyer v. Seal 534 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Fournier v. City of New Orleans 533 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Street v. Equitable Petroleum Corp. 532 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Scroggins v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 533 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Gardner v. Campbell 532 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp. 530 So. 2d 1151 La. 1988
Butler v. Baber 529 So. 2d 374 La. 1988
St.Law Inst.1954); Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process (1921); Cueto-Rua, Judicial Methods of Interpretation of the Law, 80-81 (footnotes omitted), copyright by the Paul M. Hebert Law Center Publications Institute (1981); Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corp., 258 La.
Griffin v. Foti 523 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Loescher v. Parr, supra.
Prather v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., Inc. 526 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
1980); Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corp., 258 La.
Tracy v. Jefferson Parish 523 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Jones v. City of Baton Rouge, Etc.
Brady v. State ex rel. Louisiana Health & Human Resources Administration 525 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
One of the modifications of art. 2317 is art. 2319, which provides, “[T]he curators of insane persons are answerable for the damage occasioned by those under their care.” stated that the principal of fault underlying articles 2317 and 2322 (1870) was the same as that underlying article 2319.
White v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 525 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
commented that Article 2322 further defines the application of Article 2317's general principle to the owner of the building: The owner of a building is answerable for the damage occasioned by its ruin, when this is caused by neglect to repair it, or when it is the result of a vice in its original con
Young v. Royal Jones & Associates 521 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Stoute v. South Carolina Insurance Co. 524 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Cormier v. City of Breaux Bridge 524 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
3 In Hines , we looked to the Louisiana Supreme Court’s for guidance as to how to make a determination of whether or not there is an unreasonable risk of harm: “ Tn Entrevia, Supra, the Supreme Court instructed the lower Court not to consider the unreasonable risk of harm criteria as a simple rule of law to be applied mechanically, but instructed the Courts to co
Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp. 517 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
McNeely v. National Hot Rod Ass'n 520 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
held that a person is legally responsible for the harm suffered by another only when that person is responsible for the supervision, care or guardianship of the thing which causes the damage.
David v. Reon 520 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
the Supreme Court explained: "The requirement that an injured person in order to recover under Article 2317 or 2322 must prove that the risk from which his damage resulted posed an unreasonable risk of harm places a limitation on a building owner's strict liability.
Silliker v. St. Landry Police Jury 520 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1982), writ denied, (decided in 1983)."
Ivey v. Housing Authority of City of Mansfield 514 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Madden v. Saik 511 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Peacock's, Inc. v. Shreveport Alarm Co. 510 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
and authorities cited therein.
Burge v. City of Hammond 509 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co. 510 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Brown v. Sears Roebuck & Co. 503 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
1980); Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corp., 258 La.
Rasmussen v. State Farm Fire & Casualty 509 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Pitre v. Aetna Life and Cas.
Kyle v. City of Bogalusa 506 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Ellis v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 506 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In appreciation of the difficulty in following our last ruling, cited as support in the plurality opinion in Rigao, supra.
Chatelain v. PROJECT SQUARE 505 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Cashio, Cochran & Associates, Inc. 505 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Rollins v. Elks Place Professional Plaza 505 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Sellers v. Caddo Parish Com'n 503 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Ross v. La Coste De Monterville 502 So. 2d 1026 La. 1987
Jacobson v. Harris 503 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Henry v. Safeco Ins. Co. 498 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
at 1149, that: "The requirement that an injured person in order to recover under Article 2317 or 2322 must prove that the risk from which his damage resulted posed an unreasonable risk of harm places a limitation on a building owner's strict liability.
Gallagher v. Favrot 499 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., (La.
Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Co-Op., Inc. 496 So. 2d 275 La. 1986
might have an unreasonable risk of harm to a lawful occupant of the vacant, isolated house in the country, but not to the plaintiff, who was in contact with the step because of her "legally and morally reprehensible conduct."
Landry v. State 495 So. 2d 1284 La. 1986
and cases following Entrevia , left it convinced that each case must be decided on its own facts.
Bradford v. CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INS. CO. 493 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
*898 1982); (decided 1983).
Gadman v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 493 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Gadman v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 493 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Keith v. Bearden 488 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
cited by the police jury, did not pose as great a risk of harm as in the *1078 instant case.
Burge v. City of Hammond 489 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
McCormick v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co. 488 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
App. 1st Cir.1982), writ denied