Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Entrevia v. Hood, 427 So. 2d 1146.

299 citing documents.

Burton v. Housing Authority of New Orleans, Inc. 623 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
(Lemmon, J., concurring).
Fontenot v. Fontenot 621 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Goza v. Cornwell 622 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Moore v. St. Bernard Parish Police Jury 619 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Weaver v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 615 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Cockerham v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 615 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
the Louisiana Supreme Court considered facts somewhat similar to those presented herethe situation where parties without permission went on private property and one of the parties sustained injury through the collapse of steps on an abandoned building.
Tillman v. Johnson 612 So. 2d 70 La. 1993
Chaisson v. J.J.D. Inc. 613 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Lynch v. Hanover Ins. Co. 611 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
The Boyer court also stated that the test to determine whether the actions of a (La.
Hughes v. Green 609 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
1148-1149 *993 (La.1983); (La.App.
Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety 620 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
However, this status does not bar the Smiths' recovery of damages as a matter of law; it is only relevant to the issues of "the magnitude of the risk posed and the gravity of the harm threatened".
Henshaw v. Audubon Park Com'n 605 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Fox v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 605 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Smith v. American Indem. Ins. Co. 598 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Verdun v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
The inquiry for determining “whether a risk is unreasonable under Article 2317 is similar to that employed in determining whether a risk is unreasonable in a traditional negligence problem.”
Verdun v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Scamardo v. New Orleans Stevedoring Co. 595 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Durkee v. City of Shreveport 587 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Orleans Parish School Bd. v. City of New Orleans 585 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Alexander v. City of Lafayette 584 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Oster v. Dept. of Transp. & Development 582 So. 2d 1285 La. 1991
Kitchura v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 583 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Socorro v. City of New Orleans 579 So. 2d 931 La. 1991
Rogers v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 577 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
(Emphasis added) (La.App.
Turner v. Pointe Coupee Parish School Bd. 577 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
the supreme court stated that there is a limit on the owner's strict liability.
Blanchard v. Republic Insurance Group 576 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Hopkins v. Travasos 569 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Maples v. Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 567 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Burton v. Berthelot 567 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Jones v. Gillen 564 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
LeBlanc v. Alton Ochsner Medical Found. 563 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Lucas v. Acker 560 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd. 561 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
: The unreasonable risk of harm criterion, however, is not a simple rule of law which may be applied mechanically to the facts of a case.
Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 1106 La. 1990
On appeal, the appellate court compared the testimony of the parties' experts, applied the risk/ and concluded the trial court manifestly erred.
Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp. 556 So. 2d 559 La. 1990
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Jones v. Williams 557 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Breeden v. Valencia, Inc. 557 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Lirette v. State Farm Insurance Co. 554 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
(citing Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., as a traditional negligence case); Marshall v. Beno Truck Equipment, Inc., (La.App.
Boyer v. Seal 553 So. 2d 827 La. 1989
Bell v. State 553 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Ratcliff v. Town of Mandeville 551 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Domingue v. H & S Construction Co. 546 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Levi v. SW La. Elec. Membership Co-Op. 542 So. 2d 1081 La. 1989
See D. Robertson, W. Powers, Jr. & D. Anderson, Cases and Materials on Torts, supra, p. 85; Harper, James and Gray, supra, § 16.9; See also, Geny, Method of Interpretation and Sources of Private Positive Law (Louisiana State Law Institute trans.
Trabeau v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 543 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 544 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
W.B. McCartney Oil Co. v. Hataway 544 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
’ Thus, in determining whether the duty imposed by La.C.C.
King v. Louviere 543 So. 2d 1327 La. 1989
1988); PPG Industries, Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Kuykendall v. Circle, Inc. 539 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Giddings v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 539 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA 539 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
1980); Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corp., 258 La.