Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Maxwell v. LeBlanc, 434 So. 2d 375.

37 citing documents.

Courtland James Normand v. Brittany Marie Rizzo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court has distinguished between the right that “flows from the [biological] fact of parenthood,” and the “possibility of a subsequent forfeiture of parental rights through abandonment or neglect.” See, (La.
David Joseph Main Versus Dena Bach Main La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 1 Cir. 3/11/94), (La.
Jonathan Heath Carpenter v. Erin Marie McDonald La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Jonathan Heath Carpenter v. Erin Marie McDonald La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Hilkirk v. Johnson 183 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Christina Marie Sorrells, Born Richard v. Steven Ray Sorrells La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Sorrells v. Sorrells 178 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Tracie F. v. Francisco D. 174 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Jesse Blocker v. Kimberly Ferguson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Palazzolo v. Mire 10 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
see Smith v. Smith, 41,871 (La.App.
Valerie B. Bandy v. Patrick T. Bandy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5 Revision comment (b) to La.Civ.Code art. 136 states as follows: (b)
Bandy v. Bandy 971 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Revision comment (b) to La.Civ.Code art. 136 states as follows: (b)
Barry v. McDaniel 934 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
art. 136, Revision Comments1993, comment (b), (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth a comprehensive body of rules governing visitation, all of which were jurisprudential in nature, because Louisiana did not have statutory provisions concerning child visitation prior to 1988).
Leard v. Schenker 930 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
stated that "[t]he right of visitation for a non-custodial parent is a natural right with respect to his children...."
Aucoin v. Aucoin 834 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Muller v. Muller, 94-281 (La.App.
Francois v. Leon 834 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
See La.Civ.Code art. 136(cmt.b); (La.
Harper v. Harper 777 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Becnel v. Becnel, supra; .
Mathews v. Mathews 770 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Bolden v. Rodgers 746 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Becnel v. Becnel 732 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
T.D. v. M.M.M. 730 So. 2d 873 La. 1999
Td v. Mmm 730 So. 2d 873 La. 1999
Adkins v. Adkins 687 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Bennett v. Bennett 657 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Maxwell v. LeBlanc, [ ] supra.
Percle v. Noll 634 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Ray v. Ray 630 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
We begin by noting visitation is merely a “species” of custody
State, Department of Social Services, Office of Community Services ex rel. A.D. 628 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
For a general discussion in another factual context, of the rights of visitation of a non-custodian parent as balanced against the best interests of his or h?r children
W.M.E. v. E.J.E. 619 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Wme v. Eje 619 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Clark v. Clark 600 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In Re Adoption of BGS 556 So. 2d 545 La. 1990
For example, we held that a natural father possesses a natural right to visitation with his child.
Reynier v. Reynier 545 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
(child custody); (visitation rights).
Reed v. Hargroder 525 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Gordy v. Langner 502 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Defendant asserts that visitation is presumed beneficial unless it is conclusively shown that visitation would endanger the child's mental, moral, or emotional health
Finnerty v. Boyett 469 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Maxwell v. Wester 464 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Prior to the filing of the motion to consolidate, the State Supreme Court on April 4, 1983 which reversed the trial court’s dismissal of Maxwell’s suit to establish visitation rights (affirmed by the Court of Appeal in an unpublished opinion) and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings.