Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite LeBlanc v. Davis, 432 So. 2d 239.

19 citing documents.

Fairfield Pentecostal Church v. Elwood Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
“Civil courts are prohibited from interfering in the ecclesiastical matters of a religious group, that is, in matters concerning religious discipline, faith, rule, custom or law.”
Fairfield Pentecostal Church v. Johnson 170 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“Civil courts are prohibited from interfering in the ecclesiastical matters of a religious group, that is, in matters concerning religious discipline, faith, rule, custom or law.”
Dr. Carlton L. Winbery v. Dr. Leon Hyatt, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
„Civil courts are prohibited from interfering in the ecclesiastical matters of a religious group, that is, in matters concerning religious discipline, faith, rule, 9 custom or law.‟ ” Ambush v. Mount Zion Baptist Church, Inc., 11-1028, p. 5 (La.App.
Winbery v. Louisiana College 124 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
‘Civil courts are prohibited from interfering in the ecclesiastical matters of a religious group, that is, in matters concerning religious discipline, faith, rule, | mcustom or law.’ ” Ambush v. Mount Zion Baptist Church, Inc., 11-1028, p. 5 (La.App.
Edward Ambush v. Mt. Zion Missionary Baptist Church La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
“Civil courts are prohibited from interfering in the ecclesiastical matters of a religious group, that is, in matters concerning religious discipline, faith, rule, custom or law.” (La.
White v. BD. OF DIRECTORS OF ST. ELIZABETH 974 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2372 , 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976)
Washington v. James 962 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Hawthorne v. Couch 946 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Hawthorne v. Couch 911 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
citing, Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese, supra
Mount Gideon Baptist Church, Inc. v. Robinson 812 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
the supreme court noted that Louisiana courts "have held that ecclesiastical matters are not at issue when a petition alleges that a pastor has been dismissed by his church members but has refused to leave and the church members ask the court to decide whether an injunction is warranted."
Glass v. First United Pentecostal Church 676 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Bethany Independent Church v. Stewart 645 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
citing Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States of America and Canada v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696 , 96 S.Ct.
Wesley v. Louisiana Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church 631 So. 2d 1163 La. 1994
DENNIS, J., would grant to consider whether the decisions below are in conflict with the “neutral principles of law”
Babcock v. New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary 554 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
First Union Baptist Church of Alexandria v. Banks 533 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Gorman v. Swaggart 524 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Victory Temple Assembly of God v. Galan 501 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
The Supreme Court granted a
Louisiana District Council of Assembly of God v. Victory Temple Assembly of God 444 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
As per directive of the Louisiana Supreme Court 1
Louisiana District Council of the Assemblies of God, Inc. v. Victory Temple Assembly of God 434 So. 2d 411 La. 1983