Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tweedel v. Brasseaux, 433 So. 2d 133.

73 citing documents.

Pamela Dunlap v. Community Bank of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Bruce Lloyd v. Darlene Elaire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
the plaintiffs sought to rescind three acts of donation, which they signed, on the basis that they could not 8 read and thought they were signing wills, not donations.
Paul Johnson v. Shannon Iverson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
James F. Kowski Versus Five Properties, L.L.C. and Apmt Management Services, L.L.C. D/B/A Tonti Management La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
See, (stating: “The presumption is that parties are aware of the contents of writings to which they have affixed their signatures ...
Springbok Royalty Partners, LLC v. Ralph and Sheryl Cook La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
745 Olive Street, L.L.C. v. Optimal Wellness, LLC and Sreedevi Yerrapragada La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Healthlogic Partners, L.L.C. Versus Kimberly Owen La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Louisiana has long held that “signatures to an obligation are not mere ornaments.” (La.
Tonya Hawkins Sheppard v. Progressive Bank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
“The law of Louisiana is that one who signs an instrument without reading it has no complaint.”
Francis Deal v. Adrian Perkins and Caddo Parish Clerk of Court, Mike Spence, in his Official Capacity La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Rita Garlington Weekley Chapman Leger v. Bank of New York, Mellon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
James Wagner v. DA Exterminating Company of St. Tammany, Inc. and LIPCA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Jonathan Scott Chouest v. Kirt Chouest and Kellie Chouest Duet La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Schexnayder v. Schexnayder 249 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
While under Tweedel v. Brasseaux , (La.
La. Safety Ass'n of Timbermen-Self Insurers Fund v. Will Transp., L.L.C. 245 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Tweedel v. Brasseaux , (La.
James Duhon v. Activelaf, LLC, D/B/A Skyzone Lafayette and Underwriters at Lloyds, London La. 2016
JPS Equipment, LLC v. Cooper 188 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Williams v. Interstate Dodge Inc., 45,159 (La.App.2d Cir.4/14/10), ; Burks v. Affordable Mortgage, L.L.C., 42,280 (La.App.2d Cir.7/11/07), ; Shreveport Great Empire Broad.
Detillier v. Borne 176 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 5/22/12) , ; Bagneris v. Oddo, 2 Pelt.
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. 144 So. 3d 791 La. 2013
See Scott, 512 So.2d at 362-63 ; (“The presumption is that parties are aware of the contents of writings to which they have affixed their signatures ...
DePodesta v. Breaux 116 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(stating: “The presumption is *1021 that parties are aware of the contents of writings to which they have affixed their signatures ...
Peña v. Simeon 96 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Coleman v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc., 08-1221, p. 7 (La.3/17/09), 6 So.Bd 179,188; Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05)
Hall Ponderosa, LLC v. Petrohawk Properties, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Hall Ponderosa, LLC v. Petrohawk Properties, L.P. 90 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/22/99), ( (La.
Williams v. INTERSTATE DODGE INC. 34 So. 3d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Darryl W. Richard v. Leanna Marie Glaude La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Richard v. Glaude 10 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hymel v. Eagle, Inc. 7 So. 3d 1249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
In re Succession of Berman, (La.App.
Coleman v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. 6 So. 3d 179 La. 2009
See, (stating: “The presumption is that parties are aware of the contents of writings to .which they have affixed their signatures *184 ...
Lamarque v. BARBARA ENTERPRISES, INC. 958 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Daigle v. Hibernia National Bank 945 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court states, “The law of Louisiana is that one who signs an instrument without reading it has no complaint...
Sutherlin v. Sutherlin 930 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
2 Cir. 8/18/04) , ; Boullt v. Sarpy, 30 La.Ann.
Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp. 908 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
See, (stating: "The presumption is that parties are aware of the contents of writings to which they have affixed their signatures .
Jeansonne v. Attorney's Liability Assurance Society 891 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Cason v. Cason 886 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Jarrell v. Miller 882 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Griffin v. Lago Espanol, L.L.C., 00-2544 (La.App.
First South Farm Credit v. GAILLIARD FARMS 880 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Dufrene v. HBOS MFG., LP 872 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Stadtlander v. Ryan's Family Steakhouses, Inc. 34,834 (La.
Joseph and Stacey Williams v. Thomas C. Litton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Williams v. Litton 865 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Dulin v. Levis Mitsubishi, Inc. 836 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Griffin v. Lago Espanol, L.L.C., 00-2544 (La.App.
MOBILE EXPLORATION v. Certain Underwriters 837 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Griffin v. Lago Espanol, LLC 808 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Sonnier v. *841 Boudreaux, 95-2127 (La.App.
Dimitri v. Dimitri 809 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Boh Bros. Construction Co. v. Price 800 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
"`[I]f a party can read, it behooves him to examine an instrument before signing it; and if he cannot read, it behooves him to have the instrument read to him and listen attentively whilst this is being done.'" citing Snell v. Union Sawmill Company, 159 La.
Stadtlander v. Ryan's Family Steakhouses, Inc. 794 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
[9] Freeman, supra ; see also, Flynn v. Aerchem, Inc., 102 F.Supp.2d 1055, 1058 (S.D.Ind.2000) (signature on arbitration agreement attesting to receipt of arbitral rules, even if rules not actually received, does not relieve a party from the terms of that agreement.).
Lefort v. C & E Boat Rental, Inc. 795 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Capdeville v. WHITE'S TEMPLE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST, INC. 755 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
arguing that where Plaintiffs did not read the document in its entirety, they cannot now avail themselves to a claim of error in the very document they did not read.
Lyons v. Coleman 743 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Morin v. Foret 736 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
states: "` [S]ignatures to obligations are not mere ornaments.'
Blount v. Smith Barney Shearson, Inc. 695 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Orillion v. Allstate Ins. Co. 690 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997