Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chaney v. State Through Dept. of Health, 432 So. 2d 256.

65 citing documents.

Ashley Carollo v. Tulane University La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Richard Bush, Pcf No. 2018-01209 . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Chaney v. State Through Dep’t. of Health and Human Resources, (La.
George McCarthy v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 9/23/98); writ denied, 98-2674 (La.12/18/98); -59 (La.1983).
McCarthy v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 82 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 9/23/98) ; , writ denied, 98-2674 (La.12/18/98); ; -59 (La.1983).
Warren v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 186 La. 2009
Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
DOMINION EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION v. Waters 972 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Chaney v. State of Louisiana, Through the Dept. of Health and Human Resources
Poullard v. Venable 894 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Travis Lee Stevens v. Darren Keith Bruce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
4 Cir.9/23/98); writ denied, 98-2674 (La.12/18/98); -59 (La.1983).
Stevens v. Bruce 878 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
4 Cir.9/23/98); , writ denied, 98-2674 (La.12/18/98); ; -59 (La.1983).
Conerly v. State 858 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Picard v. Vermilion Parish School Bd. 783 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 9/23/98) ; , writ denied, 98-2674 (La.12/18/98); ; -59 (La.1983).
Krolick v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 790 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
(“Prescription does not run against a party unable to act,” , 258 n. 4 (La.1983)).
Krolick v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HRS 790 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
("Prescription does not run against a party unable to act," , 258 n. 4 (La.1983)).
Liner v. Daughters of Charity of St. Vincent DePaul, Inc. 753 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Chaney v. State, Through Department of Health and Human Resources, (La.
Ainsworth v. Bulloch 749 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Chaney v. State of Louisiana, Through the Dept. of Health and Human Resources
Acosta v. Campbell 744 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Chaney v. State Through Dept. of Health & Human Resources
Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co. 739 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Morgan v. Moulder 727 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
In Re Medical Review Panel Proc. Vaidyanathan 719 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
at 1542, -59 (La.1983), and Note, "PrescriptionWhat You Don't Know Can Hurt YouLouisiana Adheres to a Three Year Limit on the Discovery Rule," 58 Tul.
Anderson v. Beauregard Memorial Hosp. 709 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
for the proposition that when a plaintiff alleges a date of discovery and files suit within one year of that date, the petition is not prescribed on its face.
Martin v. Kroger Co. 702 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere and Denegre, LLP v. Homestead Ins. Co. 700 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4th Cir. 5/26/94), ; see also, e.g., Chaney v. State Dept. of Health & Human Resources, (interpreting the identical language in prescriptive statute for medical malpractice).
Bossier v. Ramos 698 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Explained Boudoin v. NICHOLSON, BAEHR, ETC. 698 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Chaney v. State Dept. of Health & Human Resources
Taussig v. Leithead 689 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
In support of her argument, the plaintiff asserts that the instant matter is analogous to Chaney v. State, Dept. of Health
Whitnell v. Silverman 686 So. 2d 23 La. 1996
Caro v. Bradford White Corp. 678 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Fontenot v. ABC Ins. Co. 674 So. 2d 960 La. 1996
Chandler v. Highland Clinic 671 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Smith v. Fruehauf Trailer Operations 666 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Patrick's Hosp., Chaney v. State, through DHHR
Ragas v. Dewey 663 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Dowell v. Hollingsworth 649 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Chaney v. State, Department of Health and Human Resources
Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 636 So. 2d 211 La. 1994
See e.g. Chaney v. State, through Dep't of Health & Human Resources
Burdeaux v. Cline 626 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
1986); Chaney v. State of Louisiana, Through the Dept. of Health and Human Resources
Edenfield v. Vahid 621 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
LeBlanc v. Meza 620 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
See Chaney v. State, Department of Health and Human Resources, (La.
Taylor v. Giddens 618 So. 2d 834 La. 1993
1986); Crier v. Whitecloud, on rehn'g, supra; 58 Tul.L.Rev.
Bustamento v. Tucker 607 So. 2d 532 La. 1992
denied, -60 (La.1983) (applying similar rule regarding date on which it was alleged plaintiff acquired knowledge of tortious act).
Baum v. Cato 599 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
and also argues that his allegations of misdiagnosis and violation of the standard of the care set forth an independent cause of action which relates to the treatment by Dr. Baum which ended on August 17, 1989.
In Re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Milton 593 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
In Chaney v. State, Through the Dept. of Health, our Supreme Court held that the legislature has, in a limited manner, overruled the fourth category (referred to as the discovery exception) of contra non valentem.
Abrams v. Herbert 590 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Travers-Wakeford v. St. Pierre 585 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that LSA-R.S.
Harlan v. Roberts 565 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Trainor v. Young 561 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Rajnowski v. St. Patrick's Hosp. 564 So. 2d 671 La. 1990
Rajnowski v. ST. PARTICK'S HOSPITAL OF LAKE CHARLES 551 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Dunn v. North Community Hosp. 545 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
where the plaintiffs fall under category four of contra non valentem, the court found that the doctrine of contra non valentem did not apply, and ruled the plaintiffs' claim was barred by the time limits of 9:5628.
Whitnell v. Menville 540 So. 2d 304 La. 1989
See also Chaney v. State Department of Health & Human Resources
Ogletree v. Willis-Knighton Memorial Hosp., Inc. 530 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Chaney v. State, Dept. of Health & Human Res., (La.App.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by