Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 414 So. 2d 310.

45 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. LaBarrie D. Watson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Martin P. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
See, -313 (La.1982); State v. Matthews, 26,550 (La.App.
State v. Redditt 868 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
See, -313 (La.1982); State v. Matthews, 26,550 (La.App.
State v. Hopkins 799 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Although promises or inducements will void a defendant's confession, a mild exhortation to tell the truth, or an indication that if the defendant cooperates the officer will "do what he can" or "things will go easier" will not negate the voluntary nature of a confession.
State v. Thomas 711 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Although promises or inducements will void a defendant's confession, a mild exhortation to tell the truth, or an indication that if the defendant cooperates the officer will "do what he can" or "things will go easier," will not negate the voluntary nature of a confession.
State v. Snyder 700 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Pittman, supra, at p. 25 , 683 So.2d at 762
State v. Pittman 683 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Simmons, supra.
State v. Simmons 663 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Hamilton 648 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Lions 624 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Hankerson 604 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
"It is well settled that confessions obtained by `any direct or implied promises, however slight, [or] by the exertion of any improper influence, are involuntary and inadmissible as a matter of constitutional law.'" quoting Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532, 542-543 , 18 S.Ct.
State v. Hankerson 604 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
"It is well settled that confessions obtained by `any direct or implied promises, however slight, [or] by the exertion of any improper influence, are involuntary and inadmissible as a matter of constitutional law.'" quoting Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532, 542-543 , 18 S.Ct.
State v. English 582 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Peters 546 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Peters 542 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Everett 530 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Hahn 526 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Jackson 523 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Crook 517 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 511 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. DeBlieux 505 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Brooks 505 So. 2d 714 La. 1987
State v. Scott 503 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Lollis 492 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Graham 486 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Trahan 481 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Benoit 477 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Thomas 470 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Valentine 464 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Patterson 464 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Campbell 461 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. White 458 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Sterling 453 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
15:451; State v. Mitchell, supra
State v. DeBoue 451 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Shepherd 449 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
568 (1897); State v. Hall, supra .
State v. James 447 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Faulkner 447 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Tullos 446 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
held that “[t]he admissibility of a confession is in the first instance a question for the trial judge and his conclusions on the credibility and weight of the testimony relating to the voluntary nature of the statement will not be overturned unless they are not supported by the evidence, [citations omi
State v. Lastrapes 443 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Buchanan 439 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See also, wherein the trial court's ruling suppressing a confession was reversed.
State v. Mitchell 437 So. 2d 264 La. 1983
State v. MacK 435 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King 436 So. 2d 559 La. 1983
State v. Odds 430 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Defendant relies on three cases in which the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the question of inducements or *1272 promises alleged to have been made by police officers to obtain a confession: