DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lanclos, 419 So. 2d 475.

1402 citing documents.

  • State v. Underdonk 92 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Jackson 87 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Walls 86 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Hampton, 38,017 (La.App.
  • State v. Holder 87 So. 3d 241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 2008-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Washington 86 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Hampton, 38,017 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), , writs denied, 04-0834 (La.3/11/05), , 04-2380 (La.6/3/05), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance A. Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Thomas 90 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Free 86 So. 3d 29 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Buckley 88 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    trial court need not, however, specify each aggravating and/or mitigating factor as long as the record indicates that the 894.1 guidelines were adequately considered, because “the goal of the article is an articulation of a factual basis for the sentence rather than rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.” [State v.] Lobato, 603 So.2d [739] at 751 [ (1992) ] [ ].
  • State v. Diaz 81 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Dixon 81 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Gill 80 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.
  • State v. Elmore 80 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 2008-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Williams 81 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), .
  • State v. Lomax 81 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.
  • State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.
  • State v. Garner 78 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Egan, 44,879 (La.App.2d Cir.12/9/09), .
  • State v. Anderson 78 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Egan, 44,879 (La.App.2d Cir.12/9/09), .
  • State v. Pouncy 78 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Jones 76 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the reviewing court shall not set aside a sentence for exces-siveness if the record supports the sentence imposed.
  • State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Caldwell 74 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    L(La.l982); State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Moton 73 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Knight 77 So. 3d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Martin 72 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Johnson 70 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.
  • State v. Marshall 70 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Robinson, 45,372 (La.App.2d Cir.6/23/10) .
  • State v. Douglas 72 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” This does not mean, however, that the trial judge’s failure to comply with Article 894.1 renders a sentence invalid, as the goal of this article is articulation of the factual basis for a sentence, “not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” This does not mean, however, that the trial judge’s failure to comply with Article 894.1 renders a sentence invalid, as the goal of this article is articulation of the factual basis for a sentence, “not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.”
  • State v. Guilbeau 71 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    .1, the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” This does not mean, however, that the trial judge’s failure to comply with Article 894.1 renders a sentence invalid, as the goal of this article is articulation of the factual basis for a sentence, “not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.”
  • State v. Guilbeau 71 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    .1, the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” This does not mean, however, that the trial judge’s failure to comply with Article 894.1 renders a sentence invalid, as the goal of this article is articulation of the factual basis for a sentence, “not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.”
  • State v. Richardson 71 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Ingram 71 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.08/13/08), , writ denied, 2008-2697 (La.09/18/09), .
  • State v. Rockett 71 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 2008-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Scoggins 70 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Smith 71 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Mudd 69 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Cass 61 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Williamson 62 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.
  • State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Kimble 62 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Perry M. Stokes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Hampton, 38,017 (La.App.
  • State v. Stokes 58 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Hampton, 38,017 (La.App.2d Cir.01/28/04), , writs denied, 2004-0834 (La.03/11/05), , 2004-2380 (La.06/03/05), .
  • State v. Hanks 58 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), .
  • State v. Key 58 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 2008-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Key 58 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 2008-2697 (La.9/18/09), .