DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lanclos, 419 So. 2d 475.

1402 citing documents.

  • State v. Stanfield 56 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Willis 56 So. 3d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Edwards 56 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.08/13/08), , writ denied, 2008-2697 (La.09/18/09), .
  • State v. Materre 53 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (where the record clearly shows an adequate factual basis for the sentence imposed, remand is unnecessary even where there has not been full compliance with La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Monroe 53 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Mueller 53 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Summers 52 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Burton 51 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Davis 57 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.08/13/08), .
  • State v. Dillard 55 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Hampton, 38,017 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), , writs denied.
  • State v. Horn 55 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Lewis 48 So. 3d 1073 La. 2010
    (“In a case such as this, where the offense to which the defendant has pled guilty inadequately describes his conduct, we find no abuse of the trial court’s great discretion in imposing the maximum sentence possible for the crime to which the guilty plea is entered.”); see also State v. Stevens, 06-0818
  • State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 12/16/98), ( State v. Tran, 97-640 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. H. A., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    he record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” This does not mean, however, that the trial judge’s failure to comply with Article 894.1 renders a sentence invalid, as the goal of this article is articulation of the factual basis for a sentence, “not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.”
  • State v. HA, SR. 47 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    .1, the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.” This does not mean, however, that the trial judge’s failure to comply with Article 894.1 renders a sentence invalid, as the goal of this article is articulation of the factual basis for a sentence, “not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.”
  • State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Foster 47 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Hampton, 38,017 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), , writs denied, 04-0834 (La.3/11/05), and 04-2380 (La.6/3/05), .
  • State v. Blow 46 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.
  • State v. Haltom 46 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), .
  • State v. Morris 46 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Hamp *777 ton, 38,017 to 38,022 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), , writs denied, 2004-0834 (La.3/11/05), and 2004-2380 (La.6/3/05), .
  • State v. Ferguson 43 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Jenkins 45 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Givens 42 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Robinson 42 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Sims 41 So. 3d 1277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), .
  • State v. Givens 42 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), ; writ denied, 2008-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Givens 41 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua Daniel Sibley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.” Therefore, “ where an adequate factual basis for the sentence imposed” is evidenced in the record, “remand is unnecessary, even where there has not been full compliance with Article 894.1.” State v. Pleasant, 99-2349 (La.App.
  • State v. Sibley 41 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions.” Therefore, “ where an adequate factual basis for the sentence imposed” is evidenced in the record, “remand is unnecessary, even where there has not been full compliance with Article 894.1.” (La.
  • State v. Knight 36 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Hampton, 38,017 (La.App.
  • State v. Vance 36 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell James Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    the supreme court addressed the issue of whether a maximum sentence was appropriate 8 following a plea agreement.
  • State v. JSW 37 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. J.S. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. J.S.W. 37 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Eason 36 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), .
  • State v. Logan 34 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 08-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Johnson 34 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    St ate v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.2d Cir.8/13/08), , writ denied, 2008-2697 (La.9/18/09), .
  • State v. Francis 30 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In affirming the maximum sentence, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jasmine Francis AKA- Jass Faulk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In affirming the maximum sentence, wherein the supreme court held that the defendant’s guilty plea to a lesser offense did not adequately describe the first time offender’s conduct, thus, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the maximum sentence.
  • State v. CASSIMERE 34 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
  • State v. Dyas 32 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Little 30 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Cooper 32 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Davidson 32 So. 3d 290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Hampton, 38,017 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Crayton Jones, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    P. art. 894.1.” (La.1982).
  • State v. Jones 29 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Turner 32 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.
  • State v. Burns 32 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Swayzer, 43,350 (La.App.
  • State v. Stutts 26 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010