Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McCabe, 420 So. 2d 955.

37 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Rachal La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State v. Jackson 246 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2d 233 (2009) ; State v. Melon , supra ; State v. McCabe , (La.
State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Bell 53 So. 3d 437 La. 2010
United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457 (2nd Cir.1975); United States v. Norris, 780 F.2d 1207 (5th Cir.1986); Julius v. Johnson, 755 F.2d 1403 (11th Cir.1985); (La.
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
2 Cir.1993), writ denied, 94-0410 (La.5/20/94), ("It is well-settled in Louisiana that a trial court is not required to entertain motions filed by a defendant who is represented by counsel.")( ("While an indigent defendant has a right to counsel as well as the opposite right to represent himself, he has no constitutional right to be both represented and representative.")).
State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Spitz *1157 v. State, 94-0792 (La.4/22/94)
State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Lightell 761 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976); (La.App.
State v. Spradley 722 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Pooler, 96-1794, p. 41 (La.App.
State v. Pooler 696 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Price 690 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Melon 660 So. 2d 466 La. 1995
State v. Outley 629 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Conrad 620 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Sheppard 618 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
” Upon application to the Supreme Court, the case was remanded to this Court for briefing, argument, and opinion.
State v. Williams 610 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Smith 600 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Bellamy 599 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State ex rel. Simmons v. State 592 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Warner 594 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); and cases therein cited; -589 (La.App.
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); (La.
State v. Spooner 550 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Livings 548 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Walter 542 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 516 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Robertson 509 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Martin 508 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976)
State v. Comeaux 505 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Franks 483 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Bell 477 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Macaluso 473 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
both of which cited Davis favorably and allowed evidence to be visually identified and introduced although there was no unbroken chain of custody.
State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Booker 444 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Bodley, 394 So.2d at 593 .
State v. Johnson 440 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Myers 438 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court held that a defendant must show both that the testimony of out-of-state witnesses would be material and that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying defendant’s motion requesting them.
State v. Guillory 438 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983