Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Edwards, 419 So. 2d 881.

54 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Treveon Robinson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Andre V. Griffin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Mark L. Magee La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State v. Walker 221 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jared Paul Pontiff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
-11 (La.1987) (- 49 (La.1981)); -59 (La.1981) (a privilege may be asserted only as to particular questions).
State v. Pontiff 166 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
-11 (La.1987) (-49 (La.1981)); -59 (La.1981) (a privilege may be asserted only as to particular questions).
State of Louisiana v. Jaymes Larmar Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1022 (1982); the supreme court in Brown stated: 2 No witness can be forced to criminate himself, but the judge is not bound by the witness’ statement that the answer would criminate him, when from the nature of the question asked and the circumst
State v. Harris 157 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1022 , 71 L.Ed.2d 308 (1982); the supreme court in Brown stated: la2Darby, Edwards, and Coleman all held that question by question invocation of the privilege was not necessary under circumstances in which the witness invoking the privilege was charged with participating in the same crime a
State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
the supreme court held the trial court properly denied a defendant’s request for medical and psychological examinations of a child victim to determine his competency as a witness.
State v. Day 158 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the supreme court held the trial court properly denied a defendant’s request for medical and psychological examinations of a child victim to determine his competency as a witness.
State in Interest of Jw 801 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
-11 (La.1987) (-49 (La.1981)); (La.
State v. Haddad 767 So. 2d 682 La. 2000
2888 , 101 L.Ed.2d 923 (1988); cert.
State v. Ball 748 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Edwards 746 So. 2d 1267 La. 1999
State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
State v. Gerard 685 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
The trial judge gave the following reasons for her judgment: BY THE COURT: , held the trial court did not err in not allowing the defendant to call as a witness before a jury in a murder prosecution, two co-defendants being separately tried who refused to answer questions out of the presence of the jury concerning the night of the murders by invoking their rights under the fifth amendment de
Distinguished State v. Valdetero 648 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-109 (La.1986); -893 (La.1982).
State v. Allen 647 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Furthermore, the Supreme Court upheld the trial court's refusal to compel a psychological examination of a six-year-old witness to two murders.
State v. Goodwin 640 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
This Court held that, unlike the witnesses in Wilson, the witnesses in Roebuck were not charged and were not found with any contraband, making it unlikely that they would be charged.
State v. Seaton 604 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
16, of the Louisiana Constitution (1974), which provides that “No person shall be compelled to give evidence against himself.” A witness may invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination only in response to questions “where the defendant has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer.” cert.
State v. Jones 587 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Smith 573 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Johnson 558 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
3571 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1412 (1983); (La.App.
State v. Boyd 548 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Darby, supra; State v. Wilson, supra.
Esteve v. Iberia Parish Hospital 539 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
art. 401 (1967) (amended 1972 and 1984) and art. 787 (1967)
State v. Adams 537 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Roebuck 532 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
where the witnesses were charged with the same first degree murder as the defendant was being tried for.
State v. Salas Martinez 524 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Brown 514 So. 2d 99 La. 1987
(citing Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 487 , 71 S.Ct.
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Sorina 499 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Batista 496 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Stewart 486 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Simar v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 483 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Bickman 480 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985)
Watermeier v. Watermeier 462 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
1070 , State v. Richie, supra , [six years old].
State v. Gordon 463 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Richardson 459 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Young 448 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Darby, supra; State v. Wilson, supra.
State v. Wade 442 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Mattheson, supra .
State v. Freeze 438 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Foy 439 So. 2d 433 La. 1983
State v. Laprime 437 So. 2d 1124 La. 1983
State v. Dees 439 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. West 437 So. 2d 256 La. 1983
State v. Ester 436 So. 2d 543 La. 1983
State v. Littleton 436 So. 2d 500 La. 1983