Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Oubichon, 422 So. 2d 1140.

34 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Leonard James Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State v. Clement 101 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Miller 83 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Nichols 871 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson 860 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. MacCracken 845 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Sandoval 841 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Harris 839 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Corzo 811 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Theriot 782 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Donaldson 726 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Turner 626 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Richardson 616 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Because only that which is in the record may be reviewed by the court, the issue concerning the denial of a charge on self-defense has not been perfected for review.
State Ex Rel. Donaldson v. Whitley 605 So. 2d 1078 La. 1992
State v. Bean 582 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. English 582 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Edwards 575 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Martinez 552 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Dean 528 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Scott 490 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cottingin 476 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Augustine, 252 La.
State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Augustine, 252 La.
State v. Elliott 467 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Augustine, 252 La.
State v. Bennett 457 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court held again that only that which is in the record may be reviewed by the court, citing State v. Augustine, supra.
State v. Williams 454 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Fluker 454 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 454 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
-42 (La.1982) which declined to consider them, declaring: However, in the context of this case, we are unable to reach these questions.
State v. Jones 452 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Defendant’s appeal argues only the ex-cessiveness of his 24-year maximum sentence, asserting that he is not among the worst offenders, (La.
State v. Swift 449 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Booth 448 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Talley 446 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 446 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Whorton 440 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
where the Supreme Court did not consider an issue on appeal because the defendant failed to introduce any of the lower court proceedings.
State v. Donaldson 439 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983