Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Telsee, 425 So. 2d 1251.

594 citing documents.

State v. Jones 451 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
However, the Supreme Court was specifically asked to review the defendant’s *1164 sentence for forcible rape.
State v. Richard 450 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Perkins 451 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Foley 456 So. 2d 979 La. 1984
State v. Jones 450 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. McCoy 450 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Nelson 449 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Davis 449 So. 2d 452 La. 1984
State v. Lodge 447 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Foley 448 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
as authority, defense counsel contends the sentences are excessive because they have failed to follow the American Bar Association's recommendations.
State v. Jack 448 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Hayes 446 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Dickerson 446 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
any defendant who receives a sentence within the range bargained for, cannot complain of the lack of proportionality of his sentence.
State v. Peterson 446 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Richardson 446 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Wright 446 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Distinguished State v. Ogletree 446 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
[3] in which the defendant assigned as errors on appeal the failure of the judge to comply with sentencing guidelines provided in La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Harrison 446 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that maximum sentences will be reserved for the most egregious or blameworthy of offenders, and that others of similar conduct will not receive lighter sentences than the defendant in a particular case.
State v. Goodson 444 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Johnson 444 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The crime was not intentional and was not the worst of its category, and therefore does not deserve the worst punishment
State v. Barber 445 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Gatlin 445 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Lee 445 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Followed State v. Johnson 444 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court, in issuing guidelines which we are bound by law to consider in determining whether a sentence, by its length or harshness, is disproportionate to the underlying offense, stated: There are several factors which are useful in determining whether the sentence by its excessive lengt
State v. Bridges 444 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
As authority for this two-pronged argument
State v. Jackson 439 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Nathan 444 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
State v. Dixon 442 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Roberson 445 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Davis 440 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Freeze 438 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Thomas 439 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Williams 439 So. 2d 387 La. 1983
State v. Ruiz 437 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Brewer 436 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Sepulvado, supra.
State v. Williams 434 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Thomas 434 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Calloway 432 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Finley 432 So. 2d 243 La. 1983
State v. Varrecchio 430 So. 2d 655 La. 1983
State v. Lewis 430 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
[6] the Supreme Court stated: "that under the circumstances of this case a further remand for compliance with La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Tompkins 429 So. 2d 1385 La. 1983
State v. Guajardo 428 So. 2d 468 La. 1983