DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Telsee, 425 So. 2d 1251.

594 citing documents.

  • State v. Ludwig 468 So. 2d 1151 La. 1985
  • State v. Bailey 470 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Vinet 470 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    While generally maximum sentences are reserved for the worst type of offenders, the trial judge obviously felt the circumstances leading up to defendant’s conviction warranted it.
  • State v. Keller 470 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Fraser 471 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    See, for example, Purcell, 715 F.2d at 564 .
  • State v. Wilkins 468 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Terrase 468 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Childs 466 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    State v. Telsee, [ ]; (La.
  • State v. Williams 467 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Devillier 466 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Wallace 466 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 466 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    a sentence may be reviewed for excessiveness even if it is within the statutory limits.
  • State v. Mosley 466 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Pupo 466 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hayes 466 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    A sentence which appears to be severe is considered excessive and unconstitutional if it is “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime” or “is nothing more than the purposeless and needless imposition of pain and suffering.”
  • State v. Capano 466 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Maillian 464 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cook 466 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    Also in this assignment, the defense contends that this sentence is out of proportion to other sentences rendered under similar circumstances, which requires a consideration of proportionality.
  • State v. Winzer 465 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Williams 464 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 464 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Santee 464 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Richardson 463 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Smith 463 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Louisiana Constitution Article I, Section 20
  • State v. Liddell 463 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Davis 463 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Bias 461 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Dowden 461 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Kennedy 461 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wingo 457 So. 2d 1159 La. 1984
  • State v. McDowell 457 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    generally the sentences for forcible rape reviewed by the Supreme Court have ranged from 10 to 25 years, with parole excluded from two to eight years.
  • State v. Stampley 457 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Lewis 452 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Coleman 451 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Brogdon 457 So. 2d 616 La. 1984
  • State v. Calzadilla 455 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 454 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Casimier 454 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Hawthorne 454 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    State v. Jenkins, supra.
  • State v. Roberson 454 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Norman 448 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    See, for *250 example, (twenty-five years); (forty years); (La.
  • State v. Martz 454 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 682 La. 1984
  • State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
  • State v. Gayden 452 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the defendant’s sentence was “unlawfully lenient” because it failed to specify that the defendant would be ineligible for parole, probation or suspension for the two year period mandated by the statute under which the defendant was convicted (LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Welcher 451 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    1 until such time as our Supreme Court expressly overrules that decision.
  • State v. Smith 452 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Walters 450 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Allen 450 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Andrews 451 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984