Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Telsee, 425 So. 2d 1251.

594 citing documents.

State v. Russell 750 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Fobbs 747 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Webster 746 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hotoph 750 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Le 738 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Varnado 737 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Brady 727 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Telesee[Telsee]
State v. Davis 732 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Hills 727 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Lisotta 726 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Richmond, 97-1225 (La.App.
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Morris 719 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Francis 715 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Richmond 708 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Robertson 702 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Rachal 703 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3 Cir.1989), writ denied, writ denied
State v. Mitchell 697 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-54 (La.1983), are useful in determining whether or not a sentence, by its excessive length or severity, is grossly out of proportion to the underlying crime.
State v. Walker 677 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Smith 672 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Pyke 670 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3 Cir.1989), writ denied, , writ denied, (La.
State v. Lacey 669 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
2345 , 85 L.Ed.2d 862 (1985)
State v. Williams 670 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Lee 668 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Davis 666 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-54 (La.1983), are useful in determining whether or not a sentence, by its excessive length or severity, is grossly out of proportion to the underlying crime.
State v. Guzman 665 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
1980), appeal after remand, appeal after remand, the Louisiana Supreme Court made the following statement regarding presentencing hearings: Pre-sentence hearings are not required by our Code of Criminal Procedure, but this Court has held that the due process guarantee of Article 1, Section 2 of the Louisiana Constitution requires that a defendant be given
State v. Lennon 661 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Baxley 656 So. 2d 973 La. 1995
this court outlined several factors which are useful in determining whether a sentence, by its excessive length or severity, is grossly out of proportion to the underlying crime.
State v. Holleman 657 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Hawkins 653 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Merrill 650 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Wright 650 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Ruiz 647 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Slang 646 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Jones 645 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Matthews 643 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Wise 644 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Landry 643 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
2345 , 85 L.Ed.2d 862 (1985); (La.App.
State v. Jones 639 So. 2d 1144 La. 1994
State v. Perry, 610 So.2d at 764
State v. Martin 638 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Jamison 640 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Kennedy 631 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Ruiz 630 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
2345 , 85 L.Ed.2d 862 (1985)
State v. Hill 628 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Conrad 620 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. DeSalvo 620 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. McLaren 619 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Winters 612 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Perry 610 So. 2d 746 La. 1992
State v. Cook 598 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Parker 594 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992