Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sutton, 436 So. 2d 471.

699 citing documents.

State v. Beason 653 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Rubin 649 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Foster 647 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Hall 647 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Caston 645 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Clark 643 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Ford 643 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Stewart 641 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Gaudet 638 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
State v. McLemore 640 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Stokes 639 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Lee 637 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Tate 632 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Washington, supra ; (La.
State v. Black 627 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Carey 628 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Harris 625 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Hooker 623 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. McCray 621 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. West 617 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Gantt 616 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Appacrombie 616 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Daniels 614 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Daniels 607 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Washington 606 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Washington 606 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Garris 603 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Major 604 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Hall 602 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Combs 600 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Sutton, *753 State v. Chism, supra ; (La.App.
State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Northern 597 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Spates 588 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Riley 587 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Hughes 587 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Larson 579 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Randel 573 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Flowers 574 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Thompson 578 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
State v. Copes 566 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Hearold 567 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Wright, supra ; State v. Eason, supra .
State v. Boutte 564 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Christopher 561 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Broussard 560 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
When the direct evidence is thus viewed, the facts established by the direct evidence and the facts reasonably inferred from the circumstantial evidence must be sufficient for a rational juror to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty of every essential element of the crime.4
State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v, Sutton, State v. Morris, supra.
State v. Jackson 545 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Courville 536 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)