Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sutton, 436 So. 2d 471.

699 citing documents.

State v. Tanner 534 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
When the direct evidence is thus viewed, the facts established by the direct evidence and the facts reasonably inferred from the circumstantial evidence must be sufficient for a rational juror to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty of every essential element of the crime.4 "
State v. Lott 535 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Lewis 535 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Allen 526 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Mussall 523 So. 2d 1305 La. 1988
1986); -475 (La.1983); (citing cases); -1231 (La.1983); appeal dismissed, Graham v. Louisiana, 461 U.S. 950 , 103 S.Ct.
State v. Landry 524 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Morris 521 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Pearson 513 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Evans 512 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Jacobs 504 So. 2d 817 La. 1987
State v. Harrison 505 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Bolden 501 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Owens 501 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. James 499 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Stewart 498 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Floyd 490 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
State v. Guirlando 491 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
State v. Whitaker 489 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Smith 490 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Manuel 486 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
*991 Jackson, supra; Byrd, supra
State v. Taylor 485 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Fluitt 482 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Augustine 482 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Jackson 480 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Holbrook 476 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Campbell 474 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Effit 467 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Ashley 463 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Discussion: Count 3 is not a
State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Eason 460 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Ester 458 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Wingo 457 So. 2d 1159 La. 1984
State v. Walker 451 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
(No. 82-KA-2012), the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
State v. Honore 451 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Slaughter 451 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Jones 451 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Nealy 450 So. 2d 634 La. 1984
State v. Captville 448 So. 2d 676 La. 1984
the court does not determine whether another possible hypothesis has been suggested by defendant which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion.
State v. Willis 446 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Fruge 445 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Henry 439 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Recently the holding of the Shapiro case that Louisiana's standard of proof regarding circumstantial evidence is stricter than the federal standard as enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia , (1983) (1983).
State v. Fredenburg 441 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Taken in context defendant’s words and deed excluded every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” (p. 1373) *445 , (La.1983).
State v. Smith 441 So. 2d 739 La. 1983
State v. Howard 441 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Johnson 440 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983