Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Chism, 436 So. 2d 464.

249 citing documents.

State v. Williams 124 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the use of circumstantial evidence, stating: Circumstantial evidence involves, in addition to the assertion of witnesses as to what they have observed, a process of reasoning, or inference by which a conclusion is drawn.
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
5/21/10), (), this court held: The statutory rule in evaluating the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence is, “assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Rodney Bernard Newton, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Newton 129 So. 3d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Bryant 101 So. 3d 429 La. 2012
(citing Prosser, Law op Torts, p. 212 (4th ed.1971)).
State of Louisiana v. Chad Tyrone Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. M S La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 11/4/09), writ denied, 09-2643 (La.5/21/10), ().
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Devon McCray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Williams 80 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Rickey D. Arvie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 11/4/09), writ denied, 09-2643 (La.5/21/10), ().
State of Louisiana v. Luke Matthew Bivens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bivens 74 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Arvie 73 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 11/4/09), , writ denied, 09-2643 (La.5/21/10), ().
State of Louisiana v. Ron Stewart Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Martin 66 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 11/4/09), , unit denied, 09-2643 (La.5/21/10), ().
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“Although the circumstantial evidence rule may not establish a stricter standard of review than the more general reasonable juror’s reasonable doubt formula, it emphasizes the need for careful observance of the usual standard, and provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evaluation of circumstantial evidence.”
State v. Youngblood 48 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Dixon 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Lewis 33 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Greene 26 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“Although the circumstantial evidence rule may not establish a stricter standard of review than the more general reasonable juror’s reasonable doubt formula, it emphasizes the need for careful observance of the usual standard, and provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evaluation of circumstantial evidence.”
State v. Favors 28 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Daryl W. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson. 21 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. QUAC TRAN 18 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“Although the circumstantial evidence rule may not establish a stricter standard of review than the more general reasonable juror’s reasonable doubt formula, it emphasizes the need for careful observance of the usual stan *170 dard, and provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evaluation of circumstantial evidence.”
State v. Mosley 13 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Rose 955 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
State v. Delagardelle 957 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Tensley 955 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), ; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Bell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
State of Louisiana v. Dallas D. Durgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Durgan 931 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Spears 929 So. 2d 1219 La. 2006
State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
State v. Robinson 918 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Billy Ray Robinson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Hopkins 908 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Major 888 So. 2d 798 La. 2004
State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02), , *802 912
State v. Hall 875 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Francois 844 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Gaspard 841 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. Young 800 So. 2d 847 La. 2001
State v. Lee 787 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Leger 775 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Mitchell 772 So. 2d 78 La. 2000
(Blanche, J., Concurring).
State v. Womack-Grey 764 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Bullitts 746 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Owens 719 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
our supreme court stated that La.
State v. Goodjoint 716 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Jackson v. Virginia, supra
State v. Goodjoint 716 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Jackson v. Virginia, supra

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by