Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kahey, 436 So. 2d 475.

353 citing documents.

State v. Shabazz 167 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Kelly 164 So. 3d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Brooks 139 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Morgan 134 So. 3d 1160 La. 2014
(a trial court may rely on the contemporaneous statements of counsel on a plea waiver form because “[a]ny other holding by this Court would tend to undermine the relationship of trust that must necessarily exist between the bench and bar.”); (declining to adopt a rule requiring trial judges to inform defendants personally of the right to trial by jury); -09 (La.1978) (declining to adopt a rule barring waiver of jury trial except by defendant personally); -47 (La.1977)
State of Louisiana v. Albert Meaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
In addressing the issue of a defendant’s right to be present at such preliminary hearings, -84 (La.1983), explained: Presence of the defendant is a condition of due process to the extent that a fair and just hearing would be thwarted by his absence, and to that extent only.
State v. Robinson 136 So. 3d 302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Biddy 129 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Santee , 02-0693 at p. 3, 834 So.2d at 534 .
State of Louisiana v. Corey Joseph Craig La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Craig 123 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Carter 121 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 3/29/05) , , writ denied, 05-1450 (La.1/13/06), (citations omitted), State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); -47 (La.1977); State v. Howard, 10-869 (La.App.
State v. Day 119 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Rosheed Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2843 (1979), the supreme court permitted the waiver of a jury trial to be made by defense counsel when defendant was present in court with his attorney when the waiver was made, and the failure of defendant to object at the time was construed to be a waiver by him.
State v. Guillory 129 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2843 , 61 L.Ed.2d 287 (1979), the supreme court permitted the waiver of a jury trial to be made by defense counsel when defendant was present in court with his attorney when the waiver was made, and the failure of defendant to object at the time was construed to be a waiver by him.
State of Louisiana v. Willis J. Mouton AKA Willis James Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Harris, 00-3459 (La.02/26/02), State v. Ellis, 28,282 (La.App.2d Cir.06/26/96), writ denied, 96-1991 (La.02/21/97)
State v. Mouton 129 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Harris, 00-3459 (La.02/26/02), ; State v. Ellis, 28,282 (La.App.
State v. George 108 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“multiple representation is not per se illegal and does not violate the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution or Article I, [§ 13], of the Louisiana Constitution unless it gives rise to a conflict of interest.”
State v. Carper 107 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
2d Cir.1984), writ denied
State of Louisiana v. Donald Runnels La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2 Cir. 6/18/97), (), writ denied, 97-1845 (La.
State v. Runnels 101 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2 Cir. 6/18/97), (), writ denied, 97-1845 (La.12/12/97), .
State of Louisiana v. Ben James Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
art. 780; -47 (La.1977).
State v. Thompson 100 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 780; -47 (La.1977).
State v. Barnes 100 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Letrakus Tyler AKA Trey Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Tyler 93 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Jones 85 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Denson 83 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
3 accepting the definition set forth in Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.1979), cert.
State v. Olivieri 74 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
citing Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.1979), cert.
State v. Martin 72 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. McNair 64 So. 3d 205 La. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Lester Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Alex P. Papillion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Papillion 63 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Robinson 63 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Peters 60 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Robinson, 29488, p. 3 (La.App.2d Cir.6/18/97), , writ denied, 97-1845 (La.12/12/97), .
State v. Gant 56 So. 3d 313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Const. Art. 1, §§ 16, 17
State v. Pecot 54 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Youngblood 48 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. MacK 46 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
14:10(1); State v. Murray, 36,137 (La.
State v. Scott 42 So. 3d 444 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Vallier 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Barthelemy 32 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Coleman 35 So. 3d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Ard 15 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Olden 11 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Reeves 11 So. 3d 1031 La. 2009
If the issue of counsel’s alleged conflict of interest is not raised until after trial, “the defendant must prove that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer’s performance.” | 79
State v. Floyd 7 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
But this right ┴8may be waived by the defendant or his attorney, by his voluntary absence, or his failure to object to argument or discussion during his absence.” -84 (La.1983), emphasis added.
State v. Brewer 2 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Robinson, 29488, p. 3 (La.App.