DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kahey, 436 So. 2d 475.

353 citing documents.

  • State in the Interest of D. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    defined an actual conflict of interest as follows, accepting the definition set forth in Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436, (5th Cir.1979), cert denied, 444 U.S. 833, 100 S.Ct.
  • State ex rel. D. A. 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    defined an actual conflict of interest as follows, accepting the definition set forth in Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.1979), cert.
  • State Ex Rel. Da 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    defined an actual conflict of interest as follows, accepting the definition set forth in Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.1979), cert.
  • State v. Darnell 988 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Allen, 41,548 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 982 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Smith 974 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    (citing Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97 , 54 S.Ct.
  • State v. Duplessis 974 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. LANUS 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Taylor 968 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Murray, 36,137 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Archie Lewis Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Roberts 966 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Wilson 965 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Kennedy 963 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Whalen 963 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Wilhite, 40,539 (La.App.
  • State v. Barrett 963 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Robinson, supra .
  • State v. Campbell 960 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
    As to the substantive claims concerning introduction of the evidence, to rule as follows: Since the defendant intimates that he only hit and cut Mrs. Philippe after she attacked him he places his "intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm at issue."
  • State of Louisiana v. Lloyd Fuslier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Fuslier 954 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Tensley 955 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Delaune 951 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    [10] State v. Cisco, supra , as set forth in Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.1979), cert denied, 444 U.S. 833 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bryant 950 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Goodwin 948 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Rideau 947 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Davis 942 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Richardson, 39,456 (La.App.2d Cir.3/2/05), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/29/05), ; State v. Lokey, 04-616 (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 935 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Murray, 36,137 (La.
  • State v. Rose 925 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Cogswell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    defined an actual conflict of interest as follows, accepting the definition set forth in Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436, (5th Cir.1979), cert denied, 444 U.S. 833, 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Cogswell 918 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    defined an actual conflict of interest as follows, accepting the definition set forth in Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436 , (5th Cir.1979), cert denied, 444 U.S. 833 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Davis 914 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Murray, 36,137 (La.App.
  • State v. McCray 908 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Murray, 36,137 (La.App.
  • State v. Watson 900 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied, *335 (La.1983)
  • State of Louisiana v. Johnny Lee Bell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Richardson 896 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Bell 896 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Mitchell 889 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Murray, 36,137 (La.App.2d Cir.08/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2634 (La.09/05/03), ; State v. Ellis, supra .
  • State v. Winn 890 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Lokey 889 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 10/18/00) , , writ denied XXXX-XXXX(La.11/02/01)
  • State v. Reeves 890 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Douglas 888 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Murray, 36,137 (La.App.2d Cir.08/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2634 (La.09/05/03), .
  • State v. Falkins 880 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Newman 879 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Presence of the defendant is a condition of due process to the extent that a fair and just hearing would be thwarted by his absence, and to that extent only.
  • State v. Fields 877 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Murray, 36,137 (La.App.2d Cir.08/29/02), , unit denied, 2002-2634 (La.09/05/03), ; State v. Ellis, supra; (La.App.
  • State v. Spivey 874 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Murray, 36,137 (La.App.2d Cir.8/29/02), , writ denied, 2002-2634 (La.9/5/03), ; State v. Ellis, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Van Sales 867 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Goldston 868 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Robinson, 29488, p. 3 (La.App.2d Cir.6/18/97), , writ denied, 97-1845 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Roberts 864 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    1173, 1178 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)
  • State v. Cisco 861 So. 2d 118 La. 2003
    defined an actual conflict of interest as follows, accepting the definition set forth in Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436 , (5th Cir.1979), cert denied, 444 U.S. 833 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Zeringue 862 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    art. 780; -47 (La.1977).