Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kahey, 436 So. 2d 475.

353 citing documents.

State v. Arnold 706 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
: [W]hen the defendant waives his right to a jury trial by opting for a judge trial, as opposed to when he waives all trial rights by pleading guilty, we have expressly rejected several times a rule which would require the trial judge to personally inform the defendant of his right to a jury trial.
State v. Winn 705 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Mandigo 702 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Recard 704 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Salinas 703 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Pardon 703 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Washington 700 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Brown 702 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Lemon 698 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Robinson 697 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Jones 696 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
the Louisiana Supreme Court accepted the definition of an actual conflict of interest set forth in Zuck v. Alabama, 588 F.2d 436 , 439 *247 (5th Cir.1979), cert.
State v. Martin 694 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Lewis 687 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Stepp 686 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
the supreme court explained the use of evidence of other crimes to prove intent as follows: The relevancy of other crimes to prove intent stems from the doctrine of chances.
State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Ellis 677 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Buchanon 673 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
State v. Robertson 672 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that defendant waived his rights to prior hearing and notice by failing to specifically object to lack of Prieur notice or seek a continu-anee to prepare for the evidence.
State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-482 (La.1983), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The constitutional standard of fairness requires that a defendant have a panel of impartial, indifferent jurors.
State v. Taylor 669 So. 2d 364 La. 1996
State v. Bernard 665 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Castaneda 658 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Rogers 656 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Culverson 653 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Wright 650 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Hall 647 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Franco 646 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Soler 636 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Abbott 634 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Fisher v. River Oaks, Ltd. 635 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. DeRoche 629 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
-488 (La.1983): "Generally, evidence of other acts of misconduct is not admissible.
State v. Hooker 623 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Lobato 621 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Tolliver 621 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
CE Art. 404, Comment (k).
State v. Fontenot 616 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
stated, "to hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard.
State v. Welch 615 So. 2d 300 La. 1993
State v. Bonck 613 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Morris 607 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Lobato 603 So. 2d 739 La. 1992
State v. Hall 602 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. King 602 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
196 , 62 L.Ed.2d 127 (1979)
State v. Tucker 602 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Wille 595 So. 2d 1149 La. 1992
State v. Christian 593 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Wilson v. US Fire and Cas. Co. 593 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Willis 591 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Lobato 588 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Art. 1 § 13; Seay, supra; Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 348 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Brewington 587 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991