Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kahey, 436 So. 2d 475.
-
State v. Gene
587 So. 2d 18
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Art. 404B(1) and related comments
-
State v. Gene
587 So. 2d 18
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Art. 404B(1) and related comments; State v. Schwartz.
- State v. Hughes 587 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
-
State v. Rollins
581 So. 2d 379
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Roberts, supra .
- State v. Larson 579 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. McGuire 577 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Walker 576 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
- State v. James 576 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
State v. Savage
575 So. 2d 478
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "The constitutional standard of fairness requires that a defendant have a panel of impartial, indifferent jurors.
- State v. Richardson 575 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- State v. Coleman 572 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Lewis 566 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Romero 574 So. 2d 330 La. 1990
- State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Kanupp 552 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Addison 551 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Byars 550 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Rubbicco 550 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. Frank 549 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Ray 547 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
-
State v. Isaac
544 So. 2d 531
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
App. 2nd Cir.1984), writ denied, State v. Francis, 337 So.
-
State v. Roberts
541 So. 2d 961
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Kahey, *967 State v. Chism, supra.
- Wisner v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR 537 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. McClintock 535 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Williams 536 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- State v. Massey 535 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Walker 534 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Delahoussaye 534 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
State v. Romero
533 So. 2d 1264
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
*1269 at 488 (La.1983), the court analyzed the use of evidence of similar acts to prove intent: "La.R.S.
- Pearce v. POWER & TELEPHONE OF KENTUCKY, INC. 533 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Knippers 535 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Smith 535 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Everett 530 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Shaffer 529 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
State v. Broussard
527 So. 2d 1216
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Upchurch, 510 So.2d *1219 112 (La.App.
- State v. Pearson 529 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Converse 529 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Lofton 528 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Guillot 526 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
-
State v. Cappel
525 So. 2d 335
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [W]hen the defendet waives his right to a jury trial by opting for a judge trial, as opposed to when he waives all trial rights by pleading guilty, we have expressly rejected several times a rule which would require the trial judge to personally inform the defendant o
-
State v. Martin
525 So. 2d 535
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
-91 (La.1983) the supreme court said: "Generally speaking, a witness can testify `only as to facts within his knowledge, and neither as to any recital of facts heard by him, nor as to any impression or opinion that he may have.'
- State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Messick 524 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Seay 521 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 516 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- State v. Franklin 520 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Finley
520 So. 2d 1020
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
the court ruled that no reversible error occurred when the trial court accepted a waiver of jury trial where the court record clearly indicated that the decision to proceed with trial by judge was a deliberate trial strategy of the defendant and his counsel.
- State v. Haynes 514 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987