Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kahey, 436 So. 2d 475.
-
State v. Bolen
514 So. 2d 691
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982); (Dennis, J. dissenting).
- State v. Walters 514 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
-
State v. Smith
513 So. 2d 438
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
See, generally, at 487 (La.1983).
- State v. Fisher 507 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Carmouche 508 So. 2d 792 La. 1987
- State v. Flowers 509 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Garmouche 508 So. 2d 792 La. 1987
- State v. Boudreaux 503 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Ducksworth
496 So. 2d 624
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
See McCormick, Evidence, Ch. 2, § 7 at 14 (Cleary Ed.1984)
- State v. Glenn 493 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Clark 492 So. 2d 862 La. 1986
- State v. Bradley 490 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Feazell
486 So. 2d 327
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
App. 2nd Cir.1984), writ denied
- State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
- State v. Robinson 485 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Watson 484 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Gonzales
483 So. 2d 1236
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1708 , 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980)
- State v. Arvie 482 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Lambertus
482 So. 2d 812
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
- State v. Robinson 480 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Browning
475 So. 2d 90
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982); (Dennis, J. dissenting).
- State v. O'NEAL 478 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. Bell 477 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. McFadden 476 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Clay 474 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Brown 467 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Wormser 467 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- State v. Arnold 466 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- State v. Scroggins 465 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Ashley 463 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Murphy 463 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Carlisle 458 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Johnson
458 So. 2d 937
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
There are, however, a few exceptions to this exclusionary rule, : Aside from the related offenses admissible as part of the res gestae and convictions admissible for impeachment purposes, Louisiana statutes provide for only three instances where other crimes evidence is `substantially relevant' such as to qualify as an exception to the general rule of exclusion: acts
- State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Casimier 454 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Bennett 454 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Felo
454 So. 2d 1150
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
See also McCormick, Evidence § 190 at 450 (Cleary ed. 1972).
- State v. Baker 452 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Bissett 451 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Knighton 449 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Taylor 449 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Costillo
448 So. 2d 238
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
In reaching its decision on this issue, and the authorities cited therein.
- State v. Sanford 446 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Boult
440 So. 2d 766
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
3 Standards for Criminal Justice, § 15-1.2(b) (2d ed. 1980)
-
State v. Clark
442 So. 2d 1129
La. 1983
art. 622, Goodson, supra ; Rodrigue, supra .
-
State v. Kirkpatrick
443 So. 2d 546
La. 1983
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1976); (La.
- State v. Shaheen 440 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Moore 440 So. 2d 134 La. 1983