Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prudholm, 446 So. 2d 729.

589 citing documents.

State v. Rousell 501 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
citing, Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Clark 499 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Smith 499 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Broadnax 503 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Smith 496 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Petta 496 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Deboue 496 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Colvin 494 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Clark 492 So. 2d 862 La. 1986
State v. James 490 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Dawson 490 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); One-on-one confrontations between a suspect and a victim are permissible when justified by the overall circumstances, particularly when the accused is apprehended within a short period of time after the crime was committed, and returned to the scene of the crime.
State v. Lewis 489 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Buttner 489 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Medford 489 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Mancino 485 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Evans 485 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
State v. Lowenfield 495 So. 2d 1245 La. 1986
State v. Beverly 483 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Browning 475 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. O'NEAL 478 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Burell 476 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Bruce 477 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Ruffin 475 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
(4th Cir.1984); (on rehearing).
State v. Sepcich 473 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Manson v. Braithwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. McZeal 467 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
r: ⅜ ⅝ # ⅜: 4s sjc (3) New and material evidence that, notwithstanding the exercise of reasonable diligence by the defendant, was not discovered before or during the trial, is available, and if the evidence had been *146 introduced at the trial it would probably have changed the verdict or judgment of guilty.”
State v. Dauman 468 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 470 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Mere assertion that defenses will be antagonistic, however, does not require severance, the mover must demonstrate that defenses to be presented will be antagonistic
State v. Buchanan 463 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Evans 463 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
*677 holds that production of police reports is not mandated when used by the witness to refresh his or her memory prior to trial.
State v. Elloie 461 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the court found that a three and one-half month interval between a rape and the identification of the perpetrator did not automatically cause the identification to be unreliable.
State v. Robinson 461 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Hodge 457 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court seems at first blush to have reverted to its pre- Webb standard when it declared without reference to Webb that "[t]he bare assertion that a joint trial would deprive defendant of the right to call co-defendants as witnesses is not of itself a sufficient ground to grant a severance."
State v. McKinney 455 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Hall 454 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Tate 454 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); (La.
State v. Crawford 454 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Manson v. Brathwaite 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
State v. Morgan 454 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
However, cites the case of United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Sagona 451 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984