DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prudholm, 446 So. 2d 729.

589 citing documents.

  • State v. Holmes 550 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
  • State v. Amos 550 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Lee 545 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hensley 544 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Nelson 543 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Chavis 542 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bell 543 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Nasworthy 542 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    citing, Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ward 542 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Gabriel 542 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Knapper 538 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Cade 539 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Fayard 537 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Williams 536 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Flank 537 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Williams 535 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hammons 536 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    -736 (La.1984), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review of the denial of a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence, as follows: Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 851 provides in pertinent part that: The court, on motion of the defendant, shall grant a new trial whene
  • State v. Newsome 534 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Washington 533 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Washington 533 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Prudhomme 532 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Bouie 532 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Dewhirst 527 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    The supreme court succinctly set forth the principles applicable to the issue of "newly discovered evidence" : "Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 851 provides in pertinent part that: The court, on motion of the defendant, shall grant a new trial whenever: ...
  • State v. Guillot 526 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Cockerham 525 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Boudreaux 526 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    Having so concluded and finding no abuse of the trial court's wide discretion, we hold that the trial court properly denied defendant Boudreaux's motion for a new trial.
  • State v. Brown 527 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Everridge 523 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Seay 521 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Brown 519 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Anderson 517 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Finley 520 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Holmes 516 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Bolen 514 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Hupp 514 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
  • State v. Trent 517 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Herndon 513 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Cotton 511 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Gibson 511 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
  • State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Robertson 509 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Hackett 506 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
  • State v. Tatum 506 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Gordon 504 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
  • State v. Guillory 502 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    the Supreme Court reviewed the burden a defendant must carry in attempting to suppress an identification: “A defendant attempting to suppress an identification must prove both that the identification itself was suggestive and that there was a likelihood of mis-identification as a result of the identificatio
  • State v. Toussaint 502 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Savoy 501 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986