Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nealy, 450 So. 2d 634.

195 citing documents.

  • State v. Guillory 544 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Roland 543 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Vance 544 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
  • State v. Lozard 542 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Roberts 541 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. McKinney 537 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Meredith 536 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Worthy 532 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Lott 535 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Lewis 535 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 535 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Pier 530 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    [2] the supreme court stated the standard of review as: "Whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant had not proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was insane at the time of the offe
  • State v. Johnson 529 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Dean 528 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Oubre 524 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Allen 526 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Mims 524 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Collins 521 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Morris 521 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Schlessinger 525 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Walker 516 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Nelson 518 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Gipson 514 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Brantley 514 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Converse 515 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. LeBlanc 517 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Matthews 517 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Monroe 513 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Evans 512 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); LSA-C.
  • State v. Craddock 511 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Robinson 511 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Garner 511 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Green 508 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Harrison 505 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Cowans 503 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Scott 503 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Hutchins 502 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Joe 502 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Bolden 501 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. James 499 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    The standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence in a as follows: "The constitutional standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found that the state proved the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable
  • State v. Fraley 499 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Burge 498 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Payton 496 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    the Supreme Court upheld concurrent 55 year and 45 years sentences for armed robbery and attempted first degree murder where the 25 year old defendant was a first offender with a long history of mental disease.
  • State v. Lennon 496 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Woods 494 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986