DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nealy, 450 So. 2d 634.

195 citing documents.

  • State v. Mills 492 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Martin 491 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Coleman 490 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hawkins 490 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Chapman 490 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Whitaker 489 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    -37 (La.1984), the Louisiana Supreme Court made the following comments concerning the standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence to be employed by appellate courts: The constitutional standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction is whether, viewing the evidence in the light mo
  • State v. Smith 490 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    -37 (La.1984), the Louisiana Supreme Court made the following comments concerning the standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence to be employed by appellate courts: The constitutional standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction is whether, viewing the evidence in the light mo
  • State v. Fernandez 489 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Taylor 485 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Brown 483 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Rovira 483 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Fluitt 482 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Augustine 482 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Francis 482 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Cushman 481 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    See Jackson v. Virginia, supra; State v. Hart, supra.
  • State v. Mitchell 480 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnston 480 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Thomas 479 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Smart 478 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Holbrook 476 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    14:62 as follows: “Simple burglary is the unauthorized entering of any dwelling, vehicle, watercraft, or other structure, movable or immovable, with the intent to commit a felony or any theft therein, other than as set forth in Section 60.” our Supreme Court made the following comments concerning the standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence to be employed by appellate courts: “The constitutional standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction is whether, view
  • State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
  • State v. Leason 477 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Moore 477 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    State v. Johnson, supra .
  • State v. McFadden 476 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    Wright, Chism, and Captville, supra.
  • State v. Argo 476 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Rosiere 476 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Adams 471 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Pozo 471 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Dixon 471 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Harris 470 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Peters 468 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Mosley 466 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Gordon 464 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Dufrene 461 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Hopson 464 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 461 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Toomer 461 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    For example, a fifty year sentence for a twenty-five year old, first offender, armed robber was approved but the court found that the sentencing judge had complied with Art. 894.1.
  • State v. Eason 460 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Lilly 459 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Gibson 459 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Mitchell 459 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    *98 In the more recent case of State v, Nealy, the supreme court stated the standard of review as: “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant had not proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was insane at the time of the offe
  • State v. Ester 458 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    enunciated the applicable standard in this state for reviewing sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction: The constitutional standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of
  • State v. Summit 454 So. 2d 1100 La. 1984