Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Belton, 441 So. 2d 1195.

488 citing documents.

State v. Taylor 97 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Burton 98 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert, denied, 466 U.S. 953 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Chinn 94 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State of Louisiana v. Ricky J. Charpentier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Charpentier 86 So. 3d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ERIC DARELL COSEY AKA HENRY CARTER AKA KENDRICK CARTER La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
―The totality of the circumstances, ‗the whole picture,‘ must be considered in determining whether reasonable cause exists.‖ cert.
State v. Lewis 85 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Denson 83 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Martin 83 So. 3d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), cert.
State ex rel. J.H. 83 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sierra 83 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Dale Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Allen 79 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Molette 79 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Belton, 82-2061, 82-2120 (La.11/28/83), , cert.
State v. Harris 79 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Robertson, 97-2960 (La.10/20/98), ; cert.
State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Williams 74 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In such cases, there is no expectation of privacy and thus no violation of a person’s custodial rights.” see also State v. Britton, 93-1990 (La.1/27/94), ; State v. Williams, 07-0700 (La.App.
State v. Marino 74 So. 3d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS PRESTON KINCHEN AKA STEVEN HALL AKA STEVEN WEBB La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
“The totality of the circumstances, ‘the whole picture,’ must be considered in determining whether reasonable cause exists.” cert.
State v. Kinchen 71 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“The totality of the circumstances, ‘the whole picture,’ must be considered in determining whether reasonable cause exists.” cert.
State v. Dickerson 65 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Banks 64 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); *390 1198 (La.1983), cert.
State v. Morgan 59 So. 3d 403 La. 2011
( Chopin, 372 So.2d at 1224 ).
State v. Huntley 60 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Spells 56 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Wilson 56 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Terrance A. Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Martin 54 So. 3d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Mitchell 52 So. 3d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Stokes 50 So. 3d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the definition of an “actual stop” as outlined by the United States Supreme Court in Hodari D. However, it determined that an individual is “seized” within the meaning of the Louisiana Constitution when the individual is either “actually stopped” or when an “actual stop” of the individual is “imminent.” The Tucker Court further explained, “[i]t is only when the police come upon an individual with such f
State v. Williams 47 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. MARZETT 40 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Hamilton 36 So. 3d 209 La. 2010
State v. Loeb 34 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); ce rt.
State v. Haynes 34 So. 3d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); ce rt.
State v. Juengain 41 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith 28 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(citing United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Wolff 30 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), cert.
State v. McMillan 30 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Butler 28 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Turner 13 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State ex rel. J.S. 6 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
“[I]t is only when the citizen is ‘actually stopped’ without reasonable cause or when ‘a[n] [actual] stop without reasonable cause is imminent’ that the ‘right to be left alone’ is violated, thereby rendering unlawful any resultant seizure of abandoned property.” Tucker, 626 So.2d at 710-711 ; Chopin, 372 So.2d at 1224 .
State v. Bozeman 6 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1319 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983));[ 2 ] cert.
State v. Thomas 8 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Robertson, 97-2960, p. 2 (La.10/20/98), ; cert.
State v. Thomas 8 So. 3d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State v. Kelley 8 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); ce rt.
State v. Alvarez 8 So. 3d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); cert.
State of Louisiana v. Marty Palmer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Palmer 1 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Belton, (La.1983) , cert.