DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Captville, 448 So. 2d 676.

1134 citing documents.

  • State v. Lee 498 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Mitchell 498 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Landry 499 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    quoting *1323 , at 680 (La.1984).
  • State v. Malveaux 499 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Viator 495 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Olsen 496 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Davis 496 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    -79 (La.1984), the supreme court explained the standard to be used in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction as follows: "An appellate court reviewing the sufficiency of evidence must resolve any conflict in the direct evidence by viewing that evidence in the light most favorable to the
  • State v. Petta 496 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hobdy 494 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Cann 494 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Nash 494 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    that the test of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 *1333 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bates 495 So. 2d 1262 La. 1986
  • State ex rel. R.J.S. 493 So. 2d 1199 La. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • In Re Milkovich 493 So. 2d 1186 La. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State, in Interest of Rjs 493 So. 2d 1199 La. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Cathey 493 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Gaudin 493 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Sharlow 493 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. McBride 492 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    “When a case involves circumstantial evidence and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant..., that hypothesis fails, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.” at 984 , (La.1986)
  • State v. Tuscano 492 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Floyd 490 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Bahm 490 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    the court noted: “[1] In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, an appellate court in Louisiana is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    1986), which explained that: [i]n , N. 2 (La.1984), this court stated that `[t]he Jackson standard is an objective standard for testing the overall evidence, direct and circumstantial, for reasonable doubt.'
  • State v. Guirlando 491 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Pleasant 489 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Landry 488 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Moss 488 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 650 (1979)
  • State v. McGuffey 486 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Braggs 487 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) [1]
  • State v. Bonnette 487 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Langford 483 So. 2d 979 La. 1986
    N. 2 (La.1984), this Court stated that "[t]he Jackson standard is an objective standard for testing the overall evidence, direct and circumstantial, for reasonable doubt."
  • State v. Garcia 483 So. 2d 953 La. 1986
  • State v. Augustine 482 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Anderson 482 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Desselle 479 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Barberousse 480 So. 2d 273 La. 1985
  • State v. Harris 480 So. 2d 281 La. 1985
  • State v. Quinn 479 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. St. Romain 477 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Hamilton 478 So. 2d 123 La. 1985
  • State v. Rounds 476 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. McFadden 476 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Rosiere 476 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Campbell 474 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the Louisiana Supreme Court, in addressing the issue of whether sufficient evidence was presented at trial to convict a defendant of manslaughter, stated the following: “When a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant’s own
  • State v. Fuselier 474 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Mosely 475 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Sam 473 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. McNeal 471 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State ex rel. Bland 471 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2781, 2783-2784 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)