Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Captville, 448 So. 2d 676.

1134 citing documents.

State v. Boudreaux 471 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Jones 474 So. 2d 919 La. 1985
State v. Baker 471 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Rainey 470 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. McZeal 467 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Carprue 468 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Elliott 467 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Mitchell 466 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Hines 465 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
when a case involves circumstantial evidence, an evaluation of the reasonableness of another hypothesis of innocence, under La.R.S.
State v. Mullins 464 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Imbornone 462 So. 2d 1236 La. 1985
: "When a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant’s own testimony, that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt."
State v. Jones 462 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Smith 463 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Campbell 461 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 461 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Thomas 460 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Phinney 460 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Cook 460 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Sensley 460 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Brown 458 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Ledet 458 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State in Interest of PS 459 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Ester 458 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
: When a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant's own testimony, that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.
State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Wingo 457 So. 2d 1159 La. 1984
City of Bastrop v. Paxton 457 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Bennett 454 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Norman 448 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Raheem 454 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Walker 451 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Holmes 451 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 452 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Gallow 452 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Summit 454 So. 2d 1100 La. 1984