Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vessell, 450 So. 2d 938.

212 citing documents.

State v. Clay 731 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Kennedy 722 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
(decided under former La.Rev.Stat.
State v. Campbell 715 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Carter 713 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Gradley 745 So. 2d 1160 La. 1998
State v. Reeder 698 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Boyd, 95-1248 (La.App.
State v. Galliano 696 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Boyd 681 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Morgan 671 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Guy 669 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Honeycut 659 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. May 654 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
the defendant denied that he had ever been in the murder victim’s apartment.
State v. Johnson 652 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Dunn 651 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Van Winkle 635 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State ex rel. Ursin v. State 629 So. 2d 1147 La. 1993
did not announce a new rule of law.
State v. Taylor 621 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Harrison 609 So. 2d 789 La. 1992
State v. Johnson 598 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Boudreaux 597 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Lewis 596 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Sullivan 596 So. 2d 177 La. 1992
Although this court at one time consistently reversed convictions based on the type of incorrect reasonable doubt instruction given to the jury in this case, State v. Moffett, 127 La.
State v. Smith 594 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Collins 588 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Cage 583 So. 2d 1125 La. 1991
State v. Butler 557 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Smith 554 So. 2d 676 La. 1989
(erroneous denial of admission of evidence); later appeal, (La.App.
State v. Jackson 552 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Salatich 548 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated at page 943: “This is not a situation where the State simply failed to call witnesses which were known and available to it who could perhaps have specifically rebutted the defendant’s allegations.
State v. Cashen 544 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 544 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Cade 539 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Jones 537 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Romero 533 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Worthy 532 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Baker 528 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
and cases cited thereon; (La.
State v. Brunet 521 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Crook 517 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Cass 514 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Cotton 511 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Hersman 511 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Hebert 507 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Brooks 505 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Gordon 504 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Guillory 502 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in addressing a stated: “...
State v. Turner 499 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Broadnax 503 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
In short there is no reasonable possibility that the exclusion of this evidence contributed to the conviction, and we reach this conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt
State v. Parr 498 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Batista 496 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
the court said that the conclusion that the error did not contribute to the verdict must be beyond a reasonable doubt.