Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vessell, 450 So. 2d 938.

212 citing documents.

State v. Smith 491 So. 2d 641 La. 1986
art. 770; (3) whether, taken as a whole, the final charge to the jury erroneously instructed the jury that it could not go beyond the evidence to find a reasonable doubt
State v. Helwig 489 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Walker 489 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Sumpreme Court stated that: A reviewing court (1) must determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that erroneously admitted evidence might have contributed to the conviction, and (2) must be able to declare a belief beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless beyond a reasona
State v. Cook 485 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Cushman 481 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Robinson 480 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Wilson 467 So. 2d 503 La. 1985
State v. Smith 470 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
which told the jurors not to go beyond the evidence "to acquit" and, worse, did not instruct at all on the defendant's entitlement to the benefit of any doubt arising from lack of evidence.
State v. Simms 465 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Thomas 461 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. White 458 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Prosper 455 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984