Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King, 436 So. 2d 559.

1129 citing documents.

State v. Fontenot 578 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Makar 578 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Clay 576 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Montgomery 575 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
at page 563 (La.1983); (La.App.
State v. Savage 575 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Willis 569 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Goins 568 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State ex rel. Babineaux 567 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Lubrano 563 So. 2d 847 La. 1990
State v. Stanfield 562 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Lewis 560 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Williams 554 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Harper 548 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Matthews 544 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Senegal 542 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Cassell 540 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Harris 540 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Broussard 539 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Courville 536 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Everett 530 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Pierre 524 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hall 519 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Williams, supra.
State v. Grant 517 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Tezano 514 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Herrington 512 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
See, for example, State v. Richardson, supra ; (La.App.
State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Falls 508 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Hebert 507 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Coates 509 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the Court observed that irregularities or deficiencies in the presentence investigation will not be reviewed for the first time on appeal where the defendant fails to bring them to the attention of the trial court before or at the time of sentencing, citing Cox , but not La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Nolan 503 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Boyd 503 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Ourso 502 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Mitchell 498 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Fickes 497 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Sterling 496 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Huckaby 495 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Rogers 494 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Bates 495 So. 2d 1262 La. 1986
State v. Robins 499 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Tuscano 492 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Barnes 491 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Martin 486 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Gradney 487 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Augustine 482 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Arvie 482 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
discussed ineffective assistance of counsel as follows: “To establish a claim of ineffective representation, the defendant must demonstrate that counsel did not meet the level of competency ‘normally demanded’ in criminal cases.
State v. Cushman 481 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Ricaud 480 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hartman 479 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985