Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King, 436 So. 2d 559.

1129 citing documents.

  • State v. Harris 478 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Murray 476 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. White 476 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Buie 477 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Long 473 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Macaluso 473 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Tassin 472 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Green 470 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    the Louisiana Supreme Court made the following comments concerning a defendant's claim of ineffective counsel: "To establish a claim of ineffective representation, the defendant must demonstrate that counsel did not meet the level of competency `normally demanded' in criminal cases.
  • State v. Williams 470 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Bourg 470 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Dunbar 467 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    In any event, “[i]t is the role of the fact-finder to weigh the respective cred-ibilities of the witnesses, and this court will not second-guess the credibility determinations of the trier of fact beyond our sufficiency evaluations under the Jackson standard of review.”
  • State v. Papillion 467 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Simms 465 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    the court stated: "It is well-settled that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction when any rational trier of fact, in viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Williams 463 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Bias 461 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bertrand 461 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Braxton 458 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jenkins 456 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    State v. Williams, supra; State v. Wilkerson, supra.
  • State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Caillier 450 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows: "To establish a claim of ineffective representation, the defendant must demonstrate that counsel did not meet the level of competency `normally demanded' in criminal cases.
  • State v. Williams 450 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Knighton 449 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    State v. Williams, supra; State v. Wilkerson, supra.
  • State v. Wilkerson 448 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    State v. Williams, supra.
  • State v. Williams 448 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Ohrberg 448 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Keleman 444 So. 2d 1328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Cage 444 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
    defendant was sentenced to eight years at hard labor, with two years to be served without benefit, in the Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court for St.
  • State v. Carter 442 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983