Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ray v. Alexandria Mall, 434 So. 2d 1083.

181 citing documents.

Danny Ray Gilcrease v. Maximus Operating, Ltd. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Omolabake Ojomo-Bakare and Dele Bakare, individually and on behalf of their minor child, Britney Bakare v. Baton Rouge … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Paul Property & Liability Ins., (La.
Erica Kennedy Personally and on Behalf of Minor Child, Kenyale Simpson v. Morehouse Parish School Board an Incorporated … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Barrynee Moore v. Sky Zone Franchise Group, LLC, Abc Corporation and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
regarding “relation back.” This court found that “[t]he “relation back” concept of Ray, and La.Code Civ.P.
Cynthia Bryan, Aubry Bryan, Jr., Aunya Bryan, and Glenda Bryan v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation as the … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Dorothy Banish Madden v. Steven Ray Fairburn, K.S. Timber Company, Inc., Plaza Insurance Company, XYZ Insurance Company, & … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
2-Long, LLC and Composite Architectural Design Systems, LLC v. Barney Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Brigitte Taylor Haynes v. Tropicana Entertainment LLC D/B/A The Belle of Baton Rouge La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Paul Property & Liability Ins., - 87 ( La.
Nancy Anderson; Joy Manguno; Jayme Songy, as Curator for Malvina Songy; And Janice Verdin, as Responsible Party of … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Michael Smith v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Jill Stauder and Shelly Stauder, Individually and on Behalf of the David Stauder, Jr. v. Shell Oil Company, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Jessica Jenkins v. Rian Kauffman, Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, Grady Crawford Construction Co., Inc. of Baton Rouge and … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
He contends that the court improperly granted the exception based on its determination in its reasons for judgment that, ( La.
Dln Holdings, L.L.C. v. Keith Guglielmo, Land Records Supervisor for Parish of Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Christy L. Duplantis v. Encompass Property and Casualty Company and Elenor J. Fondren La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Paul Property & Liability Ins., ( La.
Akesha Allen v. Dryades YMCA School of Commerce, Inc. d/b/a West St. Tammany YMCA & ABC Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
YMCA of Greater New Orleans and the original, timely - sued defendant; therefore, La.
Willis J. Jones and Shadonne Jones v. Dynamic Industries, Inc. and Bp America Production Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Shawn Morgan v. West Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Department, Eric J. Morales, in his official capacity as a … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Paul Property and Liability Insurance, - 1087 ( La.
Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Randall J. Hebert & Associates, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
The Rapides Parish School Board v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Enrico Bunyog v. Berkley Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Dionisio Gonzalez v. Carey Leshawn Jimmerson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
art. 1153 and the supreme court’s and Giroir v. S. La.
Randall Scott Iles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
ed in the amended petition or answer arises out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of the filing the original pleading.” The plaintiff argues that this provision is applicable to the amending petition in this case in light of the supreme court’s
Iles v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 258 So. 3d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
The plaintiff argues that this provision is applicable to the amending petition in this case in light of the supreme court's expression in Ray v. Alexandria Mall
Agnes Jones v. Iberia Parish Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1153 provides: “When the action or defense asserted in the amended petition or answer arises out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of filing the original pleading.” (emphasis added), the Louisiana Supreme Court established four criteria to determine “whether La.Code Civ.P.
Jones v. Iberia Parish Gov't 257 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In Ray v. Alexandria Mall , , 1086 (La.1983) (emphasis added), the Louisiana Supreme Court established four criteria to determine "whether La.Code Civ.P.
Luke v. Cplace Forest Park SNF, LLC 250 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Love v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London 241 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Collins v. Home Depot, U.S.A. Inc. 215 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
art. 1153 provides that “[w]hen the action or defense asserted in the amended petition or answer arises out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of filing the original pleading.” (La.
Meagan Lemoine v. Lionel Augustine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
6 added an entirely new defendant, which, based on the facts herein, they argue it did not.3 In response, plaintiffs argue their initial suit was properly filed against State Farm and its insured, Lionel, regardless of Lionel’s current status in the litigation.
Bach v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners 193 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Andre Henderson v. Avoyelles Correctional Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Paul Property & Liability Insurance, the supreme court established four 4 criteria for determining whether an amended petition relates back to the original petition pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 1153: (1) The amended claim must arise out of the same transaction or occurren
Henderson v. Avoyelles Correctional Center 190 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Paul Property & Liability Insurance, the supreme court established four | ^criteria for determining whether an amended petition relates back to the original petition pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 1153: (1) The amended claim must arise out of the same transaction or occurrence set forth in the original pleading; (2) The purported substitut
Wilson v. Doe 182 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date, of filing the original pleading.” In Renfroe v. State through DOTD, 01-1646 (La.2/26/02), , the Supreme .Court reiterated the four-part test, to determine if a supplemental petition relates back to- the original petition for prescription purposes: (1) The amended claim must arise out of the same conduct, transaction or occurrence set forth in the original petition; (2) The purported substitute defendant must have received notice o
Alexis Hunt v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Paul Property & Liability Insurance, and reiterated in Renfroe v. State ex rel.
Hunt v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency 176 So. 3d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Stanley Savoie v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff Office (City of Lake Charles) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
to determine if an amended petition, which changes the identity of a party, may relate back to the original pleading.
Savoie v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff Office 157 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
to determine if an amended petition, which changes the identity of a party, may relate back to the original pleading.
Fred Bulliard v. the City of St. Martinville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-87 (La.1983) (alteration in original), the supreme court stated: In reviewing the instant case, we have found that the defendants have engaged in a smokescreen of legalistic maneuvering in order to dodge judicial resolution of the merits of the plaintiff’s claim.
Bulliard v. City of St. Martinville 139 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-87 (La.1983) (alteration in original), the supreme court stated: In reviewing the instant case, we have found that the defendants have engaged in a smokescreen of legalistic maneuvering in order to dodge judicial resolution of the merits of the plaintiffs claim.
Seghers v. LaPlace Equipment Co. 136 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Ins., cited by plaintiffs.
Duhe v. Lindsey 131 So. 3d 62 La. 2014
Paris Madison v. Richard Stalder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
is the seminal case relative to the application of La.Code Civ.P.
Madison v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 124 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
is the seminal ease relative to the application of La.Code Civ.P.
McKenzie v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 122 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
art. 1153, 4 -87 (La.1983).
Roland Douglas Walet v. Southern Theatres Family Holding, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Robinson v. Westin Hotel 177 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Walet v. Southern Theatres Family Holding, LLC 116 So. 3d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
B.A. Kelly Land Co., L.L.C. v. Questar Exploration & Production Co. 106 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
art. 5051; Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu, supra
Northa Lee Holmes v. Triad Hospitality D/B/A Clarion Hotel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Holmes v. Triad Hospitality 89 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012