Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Herb's MacHine Shop, Inc. v. John Mecom Co., 430 So. 2d 98.

24 citing documents.

Elaine T. Marshall, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the Marshall Legacy Foundation and The Marshall Heritage Foundation v. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 3d Cir. 1983), writ denied, ( La.
Benton v. Clay 123 So. 3d 212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
3d Cir.1983), writ denied
FREY PLUMBING CO., INC. v. Foster 958 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
3d Cir.1983), writ denied
Succession of Nita Hill Stark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir.), writ denied, (citing Gallin v. Travelers Ins.
In Re Succession of Stark 934 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir.), writ denied, (citing Gallin v. Travelers Ins.
John Blalock v. Kenneth W. Lord La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Blalock v. Lord 927 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Phelps Dunbar, LLP v. Stout 914 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, the Third Circuit recognized the following factors in determining whether a course of dealings is considered an open account: 1.
Hurley State Bank v. Sharon Pickens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Hurley State Bank v. Pickens 861 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Acadian Services, Inc. v. Durand 813 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir.), writ denied, the court listed four factors to be examined for a suit on open account.
Tyler v. Haynes 760 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir.), writ denied, this court set forth the following factors to determine whether a course of dealings is considered an open account: 1.
Acme Window Cleaners, Inc. v. NATAL CONST. CO. 660 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
App. 3d Cir.1983), writ denied
Broussard v. Guilbeaux 640 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
West v. Jones 612 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
See: Herb’s Machine Shop, writ denied, ; *174
Doyle v. Picadilly Cafeterias 576 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Sam v. Rogers 559 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
3rd Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.App.
Bruce v. Rogers Oil Tool Services, Inc. 556 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
3 Cir. 1983), writ denied
Sandoz v. Dolphin Services, Inc. 555 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1983), writ denied, the court set forth the following factors to determine whether a course of dealings is considered an open account: 1.
Krueger v. Tabor 546 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1983), writs denied, (La.
American Motorists Insurance Co. v. State Worker's Compensation Second Injury Board 544 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1983), writ denied, Brown v. Lykes Brothers Steamship Company, Inc., (La.App.
Brosset v. Childs Enterprises, Inc. 465 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1983) writs denied said: Louisiana courts have stated that, in order for a course of dealings to be considered as an open account, some of the factors to be examined are: 1.
United Distributors, Inc. v. Redfern 449 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
3rd Cir.1983), writ denied, some of the factors to be examined were listed as: 1.
Bowers Electronic Enterprises v. Tiffin Inn Pancake House of Baton Rouge, Inc. 444 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
3rd Cir.) writ denied, O.J.