DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chaney v. State Mineral Bd., 444 So. 2d 105.

21 citing documents.

  • Charles F. Boagni, III. Sandra Clark Boagni Trust v. Elton Sam, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • Katie King Alston v. Betty Jean Moore La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
    Appellants rely on the following cases in support of their argument that the evidence was insufficient to determine the boundaries of the property Alston possessed: (La.
  • Phipps v. Schupp 45 So. 3d 593 La. 2010
  • Saunders v. Hollis 17 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • Teresa Allen v. Glenn Edward Belgard, Et Ux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    More specifically, and from City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., which discussed enclosures as follows: 4 In an action tried by the court without a jury, after the plaintiff has completed the presentation of his evidence, any party, without waiving his right to offer e
  • Allen v. Belgard 925 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    More specifically, the trial court quoted *1286 and from City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., which discussed enclosures as follows: [W]hen a possessor does not have a title, his claim of possession is limited in extent to that property shown by enclosures (artificial or natural boundaries) and his possession must be p
  • Delacroix Corp. v. Dean 901 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • Dudenhefer v. Meraux Land Development, L.L.C. 840 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Actual possession must be either inch by inch possession (pedis possessio) or possession within enclosures.” citing, La.
  • Delacroix Corp. v. Perez 794 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Poirrier v. Dale's Dozer Service, Inc. 770 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • VERMILION BAY v. Phillips Petroleum Co. 646 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Wemple v. Eastham, 150 La.
  • Pison, Inc. v. Jackson 633 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    When a possessor has no title, his possession must be proved "`inch by inch.'" citing City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., (On Rehearing).
  • State v. Barras 602 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    for their proposition that a landowner cannot prohibit entry by force of law because such prohibition destroys the public’s right to fish on the running waters or the waters overlaying the banks of navigable streams.
  • Prieto v. St. Tammany Homesites, Inc. 602 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    art. 3658; Romar v. Estate of Gay, 454 So.2d at 433 .
  • Amigo Enterprises, Inc. v. Gonzales 581 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    On the issue of whether the water which traverses the canal in question is a public thing subject to use by the general public, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that a riparian owner “may not fence or enclose the ‘land’ so as to impede the use of the flowing water.” Id.
  • Brown v. Rougon 552 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Miller v. Hilton 527 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Sellers v. Barthelemy 520 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc.
  • Verzwyvelt v. Armstrong-Ratterree, Inc. 463 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    At oral argument, and contends that Chaney should be controlling here.
  • Todd v. State Through Dept. of Natural Res. 456 So. 2d 1340 La. 1984
    CHANEY V. STATE MINERAL BOARD Chaney was consolidated with this case and a decision was rendered therein on December 19, 1983, and is reported at
  • Romar v. Estate of Gay 454 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984