Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Owens v. Martin, 449 So. 2d 448.

75 citing documents.

Michael M. Mulkey, Sr. v. Century Indemnity Company, Petroleum Casualty Company, James Ralph Vannoy, R.H. Bretz, Ralph F. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Robinson v. Moises 171 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Anderson v. Bossier Parish Police Jury 153 So. 3d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
When an exception of no cause of action is based on an affirmative defense, the exception must be overruled “unless the allegations of the petition exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the premise upon which the defense is based.”
Sun Coast Contracting Services, LLC v. Dien's Auto Salvage, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Kyle, 588 So.2d at 1159.
Sun Coast Contracting Services, Inc. v. Dien's Auto Salvage, Inc. 148 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Kyle, 588 So.2d at 1159.
King v. Pontchartrain Mortgage Co. 134 So. 3d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation 79 So. 3d 246 La. 2011
Ebinger v. Venus Construction Corp. 65 So. 3d 1279 La. 2011
Paragon Lofts Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Paragon Lofts, L.L.C. 55 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Metairie III v. Poche' Construction, Inc. 49 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lafayette Parish School Board v. Ratcliff Construction Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Lafayette Parish School Board v. Ratcliff Construction Co. 30 So. 3d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Ford Motor Credit Company v. Dunham 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Susan Elizabeth Jackson Piccione v. Richard James Piccione La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“When a Court can reasonably do so, it should maintain the petition so as to afford a litigant an opportunity to present his evidence.”
Piccione v. Piccione 20 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“When a Court can reasonably do so, it should maintain the petition so as to afford a litigant an opportunity to present his evidence.”
Rachelle Starrett Preuett v. Ira Anderson Preuett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
the supreme court further provided that “[w]hen a Court can reasonably do so, it should maintain the petition so as to afford a litigant an opportunity to present his evidence.” In his assignments of error, Mr. Preuett asserts that the trial court erred in modifying the custody decree in the
Preuett v. Preuett 4 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
the supreme court further provided that “[w]hen a Court can reasonably do so, it should maintain the petition so as to afford a litigant an opportunity to present his evidence.” In his assignments of error, Mr. Preuett asserts that the trial court erred in modifying the custody decree in the absence of
Sonnier v. Conner 998 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Patriot v. Mississippi Land Holdings 948 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 921 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Borden v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 895 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Allied Shipyard, Inc. v. Edgett 868 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
reaffirming Jones v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
Ethyl Corp. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc. 836 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Cole, 599 So.2d at 1063, n. 15
Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. 824 So. 2d 1137 La. 2002
Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. 785 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Bujol v. Ward 778 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist., 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), ; Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Goulas v. DENBURY MANAGEMENT, INC. 774 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
PREMIER REST. v. Kenner Plaza Shopping 767 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Woodruff v. State Farm Ins. Co. 767 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Walker v. Bossier Medical Center 714 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Meredith v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. 707 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
1st Cir.1983), aff'd, the court, following Smith , held that the 1976 amendments to LSA-R.S.
Pitre v. GAF Corp. 705 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Cole v. Celotex Corp., 599 So.2d at 1063, n. 15 , -451 (La.1984).
Lambert v. RIVERBOAT GAMING ENFORC. DIV. 706 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Kyle, 588 So.2d at 1159 .
Parker v. Dr. X 704 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
reaffirming Jones v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
Gauthe v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. 703 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Young v. ED Bullard Co. 703 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
1st Cir.1983); affirmed and remanded on other grounds, (worker died of asbestosis); (La.App.
Gassen v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 687 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
reaffirming Jones v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
Reeder v. North 683 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Perry v. First National Bank of Jefferson 673 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Louisiana State Board of Medical Examin
Hill ex rel. Hill v. Joseph 655 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Aymond v. Rabalais 657 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
art. 931; State, (La.App.
White v. White 641 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
art. 931; State, (La.App.
City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs 640 So. 2d 237 La. 1994
927, 931; Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Roberts v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 634 So. 2d 341 La. 1994
Art. 927; Darville v. Texaco, Inc. Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
PREMIER BANK, NAT. ASS'N v. Stout 627 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
reaffirming Jones v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N OF LAKE CHARLES v. Jones 620 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
reaffirming Jones v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
Smith v. Gretna Machine & Iron Works 617 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Cole v. Celotex Corp. 599 So. 2d 1058 La. 1992
Kyle v. Civil Service Com'n 588 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Wallace v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 578 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
4th Cir.1984), writs denied