Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 444 So. 2d 618.

126 citing documents.

McKee v. Inspectorate America Corp. 636 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Weber v. State 635 So. 2d 188 La. 1994
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Roberts v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 634 So. 2d 341 La. 1994
Art. 927; Darville v. Texaco, Inc. Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Kibble v. BPO Elks Lodge No. 30 640 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Neel v. Citrus Lands of Louisiana, Inc. 629 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Crumling v. Crumling 628 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Eschete v. City of New Orleans, 258 La.
Mitchell v. Fradella 628 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Eschete v. City of New Orleans, 258 La.
Crumling v. Crumling 628 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Eschete v. City of New Orleans, 258 La.
Cowart v. Lee 626 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Eschete v. City of New Orleans, 258 La.
Billiot v. BP Oil Co. 617 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
In Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., the court reiterated the *30 (La.
Gallon v. Vaughan Contractors, Inc. 619 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Trahan v. Trans-Louisiana Gas Co., Inc. 618 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Bespress, Inc. v. Capital Bank of Delhi 616 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Art. 931; Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Leenerts Farms
Courtney v. Courtney 613 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Eschete v. City of New Orleans, 258 La.
Sharrif v. American Broadcasting Co. 613 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Landrum v. Matthews 612 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
See: Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Petition of Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans
Armstead v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 609 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Fuselier v. Amoco Production Co. 607 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Tuminello v. Willis Knighton Medical Center 597 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
See Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Faridnia v. Ecolab, Inc. 593 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Rankins v. Aytch 591 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Wallace v. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL 586 So. 2d 149 La. 1991
See Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
King v. Schuylkill Metals Corp. 581 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Kuebler v. Martin 578 So. 2d 113 La. 1991
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Darville v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Professional Occupational Therapy Services, Inc. v. Vanco Human Services, Inc. 572 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Tenhaaf v. Quenqui 571 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Mahfouz v. JACE Oilfield Sales and Service, Inc. 569 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., "
Lyons v. Airdyne Lafayette, Inc. 558 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., ” Simoneaux v. E.I.
Carey v. UMC (United Mechanical Contractors) 553 So. 2d 472 La. 1989
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Carey v. UMC 553 So. 2d 472 La. 1989
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Hemphill-Kunstler-Buhler, Auctioneers & Appraisers v. Davis Wholesale Electronics Supply Co. 555 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Neal v. Superior Enterprises, Inc. 552 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
art. 931 “For the purpose of determining the issues raised by this exception, the well pleaded facts in the petition and any annexed documents must be accepted as true.” Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Menge v. Menge 545 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Thomas v. State 545 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
article 927; Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Banes v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 544 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
W.B. McCartney Oil Co. v. Hataway 544 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Honeywell, Inc. v. Sierra 543 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
927, 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Johnfroe v. Children's Hosp. 537 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
art. 931; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc. (La.
Hare v. Ganaway Construction Co. 536 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
St. Landry Parish Pol. Jury v. Clerk of Ct. of St. Landry Parish 536 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.
Roberson v. Bossier Parish Police Jury 535 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Art. 927; Darville v. Texaco, Inc., rehearing denied Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., (La.App.
Akins v. Parish of Jefferson 533 So. 2d 970 La. 1988
See Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Homer Nat. Bank v. Tri-District Dev. Corp. 534 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc., AA reconsideration denied, Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
First Union Baptist Church of Alexandria v. Banks 533 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
1984); Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Chaisson v. Henning 525 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Summary judgment shall be granted when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with any affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact.
O'Neill v. Galatas 522 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Among reasons assigned for application of the policy are: the avoidance of indefinite relitigation of the same issue; the desirability of consistency of the result in the same litigation; and the efficiency, and the essential fairness to both parties, of affording a single opportunity for the argument and decision of matter at issue.” (Footnotes omitted) See also Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Sunlake Apartment Residents v. Tonti Development Corp. 522 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Hood v. South Louisiana Medical Center 517 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
23:1032; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Pennington v. Kyzar 510 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Hong v. Lucien 505 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.