Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Ins. Co. of N. America, 454 So. 2d 1113.

126 citing documents.

Dessie Falcon Bella v. Mary Knieper and Henry Knieper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Theresa S. Hatchell v. St. Michael Pfu, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
In awarding penalties and attorney fees based on an employer’s termination of workers’ compensation benefits, the supreme court, stated: An insurer is required to make a reasonable effort to ascertain an employee’s exact medical condition before benefits are terminated.
Gaines v. Home Care Solutions, LLC 192 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Grady P. Galland v. Heidi M. Galland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Janet Leblanc v. Excel Auto Parts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
LeBlanc v. Excel Auto Parts 67 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co. of N. America, Clark v. Town of Basile, 01-1203 (La.App.
Settles v. Paul 61 So. 3d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
plaintiff is entitled to no special inferences in his favor, but “uncontrovert-ed testimony should be taken as true to establish a fact for which it is offered absent circumstances in the record casting suspicion on the reliability of the testimony and a sound reason for its rejection.” Bartley v. Fondren, 43,779 (La.App.2d Cir.12/3/08), , Fuller v. WaV-Mart *858 Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Michael Hindelang, III v. Regina Louviere Hindelang La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Co. of No. America, With regard to the deposition of Regina’s treating physician, Dr. Dupon, the trial court stated that it did not believe Dr. Dupon’s testimony.
Hindelang v. Hindelang 49 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co. of No. America, With regard to the deposition of Regina’s treating physician, Dr. Dupon, the trial court stated that it did not believe Dr. Dupon’s testimony.
Hunter v. James Machine Works, Inc. 48 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
A plaintiff is entitled to no special inferences in his favor, but “uncon-troverted testimony should be taken as true to establish a fact for which it is offered absent circumstances in the record casting suspicion on the reliability of the testimony and a sound reason for its rejection.” Bartley v. Fondren, supra.
Bartley v. Fondren 999 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Roussell v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 943 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See, (insurer was justified in terminating benefits upon receipt of a doctor's report showing the employee could return to work, but a later report with conflicting information required the insurer to investigate whether reinstatement of benefits was called for); Walker v. Gaines P. Wilson & Son, Inc.
Green v. K-Mart Corp. 874 So. 2d 838 La. 2004
McCarter v. Sanchez 874 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[i]n evaluating evidence, the trier of fact should accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of a plaintiff witness, absent a sound reason for its rejection.” 454 So.2d at 1117 .
Celia Ann Marks v. Ohmeda, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Marks v. Ohmeda, Inc. 871 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Green v. K-Mart Corp. 849 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co. of No. America, while we must accord weight to the reasonable evaluations of fact by a trier of fact, an "appellate court is not required by this principle to affirm the trier of fact's refusal to accept as credible uncontradicted testimony, or greatly preponderant, objectively-corroborated testimony where the record
Green v. K-Mart Corp. 834 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Co. of No. America, while we must accord weight to the reasonable evaluations of fact by a trier of fact, an "appellate court is not required by this principle to affirm the trier of fact's refusal to accept as credible uncontradicted testimony, or greatly preponderant, objectively-corroborated testimony where the record
D & D INVESTMENTS v. First Bank and Trust 831 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
1986); Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Beasley v. Ed's Mobile Homes, Inc. 824 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Adams v. Bayou Steel Corp. 813 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[6] Scott v. Town of Jonesville, 96-41 (La.App.
Cloy v. Lee 807 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
State Ex Rel. Gjl 791 So. 2d 80 La. 2001
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., ).
State ex rel. G.J.L. 791 So. 2d 80 La. 2001
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., ).
Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 792 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Wiltz v. Baudin's Sausage Kitchen 763 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Co. of North America, (La.App.
Stewart v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 762 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Nelson v. Parish of Jefferson, Department of Streets 747 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
1986); Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Southeast Seafood Brokerage, Inc. v. Bernard 759 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co., Williams v. Keystone General 6Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Mayeux v. Selle 747 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
In Re Succession of Wagner 746 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
1986); Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Hicks v. Hicks 733 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., 488 * Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Gross v. Maison Blanche, Inc. 732 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Parfait v. Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. 733 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Calais Square Ltd. v. LeDoux 722 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Collins v. Magnolia Marketing Co. 717 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
In Re Succession of Steckler 712 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., (La.
Hodges v. Quail Tools, Inc. 709 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Co. of N. America, -1119 (La.
Greis v. Lake Charles Memorial Hosp. 709 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Bostwick v. MAPP Industries, Inc. 707 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
1986); Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Lemoine v. Harris Management Co. 702 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Nalle v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 702 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Mullins v. State 686 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
of North America, Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Stewart v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 686 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
1986); Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Foster v. Liberty Rice Mill 690 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Granger v. Nelson Logging 685 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Jackson v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 676 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3 Cir. 3/27/96) , ___ So.2d ___ [ 1996 WL 138492 ]
Hataway v. Jeep Corp. 679 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Faul v. Bonin 678 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Cain v. Aquarius Builders, Inc. 680 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
at 1117: An insurer is required to make a reasonable effort to ascertain an employee's exact medical condition before benefits are terminated...